Effective combination of arthroscopic and minimally invasive surgery for chronic posterolateral elbow instability
https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-1-74-82
Abstract
Introduction Trauma and extreme physical activity may result in common patterns of forearm dislocation, which account for 10 to 25 % of all elbow injuries in the adult population. Good long-term results of eliminating joint dislocation with the use of conservative treatment have been much described, but 8 % of patients experience symptoms of chronic instability. We present a case of successful arthroscopic treatment of ligamentous stabilizers of the elbow joint using an effective combination of implants for its posterolateral instability. We found no publications on such an experience in the Russian literature.
The purpose of the work is to present a clinical case of an effective combination of arthroscopic and minimally invasive surgery methods for reconstruction of the ligamentous apparatus in chronic posterolateral instability of the elbow joint.
Material and methods Patient N., 31 years old, suffered chronic posterolateral rotational instability of the left elbow joint after dislocation of the forearm bones for more than 10 years. The operative technique was based on the principles of minimally invasive reconstructive plastic surgery and meets the objectives of gentle treatment of soft tissues, allowing visualization of the lesion and avoiding the contact with neuro‑vascular structures. Baseline clinical tests (O'Driscoll, Regan/Lapner, Pollock), questionnaires (VAS, DASH, MEPS, SF‑36), and MRI, 1.5 Tesla MRI scans of dynamic stabilizer disruption are reflected. Evaluation was performed at two control points (45 and 180 days).
Results The assessment was carried out at two control points. First follow-up (45 days): flexion/extension 50/175º, pronation/supination 90/90º, VAS 2, DASH 24.2, MEPS 80 points, respectively. Second follow‑up (180 days): VAS 1, DASH 9.2, MEPS 95 points, comparative ranges of motion corresponded to a healthy joint. An MRI study confirmed the progress of the autotenograft and tendon ligamentization in the area of reinsertion, the absence of inflammatory changes and no heterotopic ossification.
Discussion Improvements in elbow surgery and technical progress are focused on minimally invasive interventions, while arthroscopy of the elbow joint is still technically difficult due to a limited space. And yet, this is an effective treatment method, as a result of which specialists can avoid a wide range of complications (14.7 %), and patients start rehabilitation faster and, as a result, recover faster than with open surgical approaches with a higher percentage of risks (52 %).
Conclusion The combination of the above techniques avoids conflict with neurovascular structures, provides visual control of the implantation of anchors and, as a result, reduces the overall risk of complications in the treatment of a rare group of patients with instability of the elbow joint.
Keywords
About the Authors
A. E. MedvedchikovRussian Federation
Artem E. Medvedchikov — Candidate of Medical Sciences, junior researcher, orthopaedic surgeon
Novosibirsk
Moscow
E. A. Anastasieva
Russian Federation
Evgeniya A. Anastasieva — Candidate of Medical Sciences, orthopaedic surgeon
Novosibirsk
B. A. Oleynik
Russian Federation
Boris A. Oleynik — orthopaedic surgeon
Moscow
A. A. Simonyan
Russian Federation
Amayak A. Simonyan — orthopaedic surgeon
Moscow
T. E. Prokopovich
Russian Federation
Timofey E. Prokopovich — clinical resident
Novosibirsk
I. A. Kyrilova
Russian Federation
Irina A. Kirilova — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director for Research
Novosibirsk
References
1. Karbach LE, Elfar J. Elbow Instability: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Diagnostic Maneuvers, and Testing. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(2):118‑126. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.11.025.
2. Calderazzi F, Garzia A, Leigheb M, et al. Simple and stable elbow dislocations: results after conservative treatment. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(4-S):224-231. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9637.
3. Rezaie N, Gupta S, Service BC, Osbahr DC. Elbow Dislocation. Clin Sports Med. 2020;39(3):637-655. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2020.02.009.
4. Wilk KE, Arrigo CA, Bagwell MS, et al. Repair of the Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Rehabilitation Following Internal Brace Surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(4):253-261. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2019.8215.
5. Isobe F, Nakamura K, Yamazaki H, et al. Difficult closed reduction of elbow dislocations: two case reports from a multicenter retrospective chart review. JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2021;2(1):113-116. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2021.10.006.
6. Cho CH, Kim BS, Yi J, et al. Common extensor complex is a predictor to determine the stability in simple posterolateral elbow dislocation: analysis of MR images of stable vs. unstable dislocation. J Clin Med. 2020;9(10):3094. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103094.
7. Егиазарян К.А., Ратьев А.П., Данилов М.А., Бадриев Д. А. Лечение простой травматической нестабильности локтевого сустава. Кафедра травматологии и ортопедии. 2021;(4):69-79. doi: 10.17238/2226-2016-2021-4-69-79.
8. Pederzini LA, Di Palma F, Safran MR, Bain GI. Elbow arthroscopy: state of the art. J ISAKOS. 2017;2(5):279-294. doi: 10.1136/jisakos-2016-000089.
9. Regan W, Lapner PC. Prospective evaluation of two diagnostic apprehension signs for posterolateral instability of the elbow. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15(3):344-346. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.03.009.
10. Luokkala T, Temperley D, Basu S, et al. Analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed soft tissue injury pattern in simple elbow dislocations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(2):341-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.08.010.
11. Marinelli A, Guerra E, Rotini R. Elbow instability: Are we able to classify it? Review of the literature and proposal of an all-inclusive classification system. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(Suppl 1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0424-1.
12. Adams JE. Elbow Instability: Evaluation and Treatment. Hand Clin. 2020;36(4):485-494. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2020.07.013.
13. Ahmed AF, Alzobi OZ, Hantouly AT, et al. Complications of elbow arthroscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(11):23259671221137863. doi: 10.1177/23259671221137863.
14. Schnetzke M, Porschke F, Kneser U, et al. Functional outcomes and complications of open elbow dislocations. Obere Extrem. 2018;13(3):204-210. doi: 10.1007/s11678-018-0466-0.
15. Hackl M, Müller LP, Wegmann K. The circumferential graft technique for treatment of chronic multidirectional ligamentous elbow instability. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2017;7(1):e6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.16.00078.
16. Goretti C, Pari C, Puzzo A, et al. Injury of the brachial artery accompanying simple closed elbow dislocation: a case report. Acta Biomed. 2020;91(14-S):e2020030. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i14-S.8507.
17. Ратьев А.П. Лечение повреждений области локтевого сустава: дис. ... д-ра мед. наук. М.; 2015:252. Доступно по: https://sechenov.ru/upload/222331.pdf. Ссылка активна на 02.10.2024.
18. Егиазарян К.А., Ратьев А.П., Лазишвили Г.Д. и др. Локтевой сустав. Учебное пособие. Под ред. Егиазаряна К.А., Ратьева А.П. М.: Медицинское информационное агентство; 2019:464. Доступно по: https://medkniga.ru/files/book_fragments_files/33678int.pdf. Ссылка активна на 02.10.2024.
19. Burnham J, Murr K, Kamineni S. Arthroscopy of the Elbow: The Basics. In: Kulkarni SB. (ed.) Textbook of Orthopedics and Trauma (4 Volumes). 2016:2008-2014.
20. Robinson PM, Griffiths E, Watts AC. Simple elbow dislocation. Shoulder Elbow. 2017;9(3):195-204. doi: 10.1177/1758573217694163.
Review
For citations:
Medvedchikov A.E., Anastasieva E.A., Oleynik B.A., Simonyan A.A., Prokopovich T.E., Kyrilova I.A. Effective combination of arthroscopic and minimally invasive surgery for chronic posterolateral elbow instability. Genij Ortopedii. 2025;31(1):74-82. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-1-74-82