Preview

Genij Ortopedii

Advanced search

Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents (literature review, illustrated with clinical observations)

https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-282-291

EDN: ZXIXOK

Abstract

Introduction An analysis of the medical literature devoted to various aspects of transitional lumbosacral vertebrae shows that there are very few publications covering the course of this disease in  the  pediatric and adolescent population.

Aim To study the issues of epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of transitional lumbosacral vertebrae in paediatric and adolescent patients based on the analysis of current medical literature and illustrate the material with our own clinical observations.

Material and methods To analyze the literature on the topic, 75 papers published between 1984 and 2023 were selected. Among them, there were 7 (9.3 %) domestic literary sources, 68 (90.7 %) were foreign. In the process of searching for scientific articles, the resources of the electronic databases of current medical information PubMed and CyberLeninka were used.

Results and discussion The incidence of transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents is 16.8 % of clinical observations, as reported. In the structure of the transitional vertebrae in children, type II of  the  disease predominates according to the classification Castellvi et al (1984), 43.2 % of cases. The main clinical symptom of the pathology is pain of lumbosacral location, the intensity of which on the visual analog scale in children corresponds to an average of 3.0 points. In adult patients with similar pathology, the average pain intensity measured with the same scale is 7.5 points. The most informative method for  diagnosing the  disease is computed tomography, which allows obtaining both 3D images and sections at the level of pseudarthrosis between the enlarged transverse process (or processes) of the suprasacral vertebra and the wing of the sacrum. To  relieve pain in children with transitional vertebrae, both conservative and surgical methods are used. The most commonly used procedure is pseudarthrectomy. The study of  long-term results one year after the intervention allowed us to record the absence of pain in children who underwent surgery. Prevention measures for transitional lumbosacral vertebrae have not been developed.

Conclusion The analysis of the published literature shows that transitional vertebrae are a frequently diagnosed pathology in children and adolescents. Current methods of imaging are able to accurately detect not only the  presence of the disease, but also to differentiate its type. The main clinical symptom of  transitional vertebrae is pain in the lumbosacral spine which is difficult to relieve with conservative therapy. Pseudarthrectomy is the most frequent surgical method of treatment in children and adolescents that provides stable relief of vertebrogenic pain syndrome. Measures for specific prevention of the disease have not been developed.

About the Authors

E. G. Skryabin
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation

Evgeniy G. Skryabin — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department

Tyumen



A. Yu. Krivtsov
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2
Russian Federation

Alexey Yu. Krivtsov — radiologist

Tyumen



O. A. Kicherova
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation

Oksana A. Kicherova — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Tyumen

Scopus Author ID: 56806916100



I. N. Klokov
Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2
Russian Federation

Ilya N. Klokov — radiologist

Tyumen



P. B. Zotov
Tyumen State Medical University
Russian Federation

Pavel B. Zotov — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Institute of Clinical Medicine

Tyumen



M. A. Akselrov
Tyumen State Medical University; Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2
Russian Federation

Mikhail A. Akselrov — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Tyumen



References

1. Kabak SL, Zatochnaya VV, Zhizhko-Mikhasevich NO. Congenital anomalies of the lumbosacral spine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, medical series. 2020;17(4):401-408. (In Russ.) doi: 10.29235/1814-6023-2020-17-4-401-408

2. Ashour A, Hassan A, Aly M. et al. Prevalence of Bertolotti's Syndrome in Lumbosacral Surgery Procedures. Cureus. 2022;14(6):26341. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26341

3. Krenn VA, Fornai C, Webb NM, Woodert MA, Prosch H, Haeusler M. The morphological consequences of segmentation anomalies in the human sacrum. Am J Biol Anthropol. 2022;177(4):690-707. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24466

4. Vaidya R, Bhatia M. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra in Military Aviation Candidates: A Cross-Section Study. Indian J Aerosp Med. 2021;65(1):29-32. doi: 10.25259/IJASM_50_2020

5. Passias PG, Poorman GW, Jalai CM, et al. Incidence of Congenital Spinal Abnormalities Among Pediatric Patients and Their Association With Scoliosis and Systemic Anomalies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(8):e608-e613. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001066

6. Skryabin EG. Local injection therapy for pain syndrome in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Russian Journal of Pain. 2023;21(2):66-71. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/pain20232102166

7. Skryabin EG, Nazarova AS, Zotov PB, et al. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents with a lumbar injury: diagnosis frequency and clinical symptoms. Genij Ortopedii. 2023;29(1):43-48. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-1-43-48

8. Zhang B, Wang L, Wang H, et al. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra: Possible Role in the Pathogenesis of Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation. World Neurosurg. 2017;107:983-989. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.07.095

9. Sugiura K, Morimoto M, Higashino K. et al. Transitional vertebrae and numerical variants of the spine: prevalence and relationship to low back pain or degenerative spondylolisthesis. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(7):1301–1308. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2020-1760.R1

10. Hanhivaara J, Määttä JH, Karppinen J, et al. The Association of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae with Low Back Pain and Lumbar Degenerative Findings in MRI: A Large Cohort Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(2):153-162. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004244

11. Desai A, McGrath K, Rao EM, et al. Examining degenerative disease adjacent to lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: a retrospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023:1-8. doi: 10.3171/2023.2.SPINE221071

12. Yulin VS, Shpagin MV, Kolesnikov MV. Bertolotti’s Syndrome. Difficult Patient. 2020;18(3):13-16. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24411/2074-1995-2020-10012

13. Bhagchandani C, Murugan C, Jakkepally S, et al. A Whole Spine MRI Based Study of the Prevalence, Associated Disc Degeneration and Anatomical Correlations of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra. Global Spine J. 2023:21925682231161559. doi: 10.1177/21925682231161559

14. Murgai RR, Ponrartana S, Andras LM, et al. Symptomatic Unilateral Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Clinical and Imaging Assessment. Spine Res. 2021;7(7):25. doi: 10.36648/2471-8173.21.7.25

15. Kaniewska M, Kuhn D, Deininger-Czermak E, et al. 3D zero-echo time and 3D T1-weighted gradient-echo MRI sequences as an alternative to CT for the evaluation of the lumbar facet joints and lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Acta Radiol. 2023;64(6):2137-2144. doi: 10.1177/02841851231165487

16. Milicić G, Krolo I, Anticević D, et al. Causal connection of non-specific low back pain and disc degeneration in children with transitional vertebra and/or Spina bifida occulta: role of magnetic resonance-prospective study. Coll Antropol. 2012;36(2):627-633.

17. Park MK, Son SK, Park WW, et al. Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy for Decompression of Extraforaminal Stenosis at the Lumbosacral Junction: Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes. Neurospine. 2021;18(4):871-879. doi: 10.14245/ns.2142146.073

18. Fortin JD, Falco FJ. The Fortin finger test: an indicator of sacroiliac pain. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997;26(7):477-480.

19. Achta AF, Hamdaoui O, Banao M. et al. Imaging of Bertolotti Syndrome. EAS J Radiol Imaging Technol. 2022:4(6):139‑142. doi: 10.36349/easjrit.2022.v04i06.005

20. Farheen B, Madhavi C, Kumar MP. Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra in patients presenting with low backache and it's association with degenerative spine changes on MRI: a study in rural tertiary care hospital of South India. Indian J Applied Research. 2023;13(3):57-60. doi: 10.36106/ijar/9002382

21. Becker L, Adl Amini D, Ziegeler K, et al. Approach-related anatomical differences in patients with lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae undergoing lumbar fusion surgery at level L4/5. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(4):1753‑1759. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04303-2

22. Sencan S, Azizov S, Celenlioglu AE, et al. Effect of sacralization on the success of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection treatment: prospective clinical trial. Skeletal Radiol. 2023;52(10):1949-1957. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-04089-3

23. Brault JS, Smith J, Currier BL. Partial lumbosacral transitional vertebra resection for contralateral facetogenic pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(2):226-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200101150-00020

24. Chu ECP, Huang KHK, Shum JSF. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra as a potential contributing factor to scoliosis: a report of two cases. Asia-Pac Chiropr J. 2020;1:007. doi: 10.46323/2021007

25. Ali E, Hossain F, Kakuli SA. et al. Interpretation and Therapeutic Intervention of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra (LSTV). Biomed J Sci & Tech Res. 2023;47(5):39982-39987. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2023.47.007569

26. Ibrahim DA, Myung KS, Skaggs DL. Ten percent of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have variations in the number of thoracic or lumbar vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(9):828-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00461

27. Chiu CK, Chin TF, Chung WH, et al. Variations in the Number of Vertebrae, Prevalence of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra and Prevalence of Cervical Rib among Surgical Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: An Analysis of 998 Radiographs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004711

28. Lee CS, Ha JK, Kim DG, et al. The clinical importance of lumbosacral transitional vertebra in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(17):E964-E970. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000945

29. Garg B, Mehta N, Goyal A, et al. Variations in the Number of Thoracic and Lumbar Vertebrae in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Retrospective, Observational Study. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(2):359-367. doi: 10.14444/8047

30. Can TS. Evaluation of scoliosis in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebra. J Surg Med. 2020;4(6):486-490. doi: 10.28982/josam.735849

31. Schmitz A, Reutershahn E, Seiffert P, Das M. First description of frequent occurrence of supernumerary lumbar ribs and transitional vertebrae in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Pediatr Radiol. 2023;53(2):244-248. doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05493-6

32. Andronnikov E.A., Mikhalkina N.G., Alekseeva T.V., Gogulina N.V. Characteristics of surgical treatment of patients with comorbidities in scoliotic disease. Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal). 2020;98(11-12):781-787. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30629/0023-2149-2020-98-11-12-781-787

33. Hu Z, Zhang Z, Zhao Z, et al. A neglected point in surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Variations in the number of vertebrae. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(34):e4682. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004682

34. Yamauchi I, Nakashima H, Machino M, et al. Relationship between lumbosacral transitional vertebra and postoperative outcomes of patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Eur Spine J. 2023;32(6):2221-2227. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07752-y

35. Syundyukov АR, Nikolayev NS, Kuzmina VА, et al. Minimally Invasive Reconstruction of Vertebral Arch in Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2021;13(5):62-68. doi: 10.17691/stm2021.13.5.08

36. Skryabin EG, Yakovlev EO, Galeeva OV. Radiological characteristics of dysplasias and abnormalities of the development of lumbosacral localization in children with spondylolisthesis of the lower lumbar vertebrae. REJR. 2021;11(4):75-83. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21569/2222-7415-2021-11-4-75-83

37. Yao X, Ding R, Liu J, et al. Association between lumbar sacralization and increased degree of vertebral slippage and disc degeneration in patients with L4 spondylolysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019:1-5. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.SPINE18900

38. Khudyakova НВ, Pchelin ИЮ, Shishkin АН, et al. Urological pathology in patients with Spina bifida: a review. Juvenis Scientia. 2022;8(5):5-15. (In Russ.) doi: 10.32415/jscientia_2022_8_5_5-15

39. Yonguc G, Sayhan S, Cirpan S, et al. Posterior Wall Defect of Sacrum: An Anatomical Study of Sacral Spina Bifida. Turk Neurosurg. 2021;31(3):339-347. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.29180-20.3

40. Paraskevas G, Tzika M, Kitsoulis P. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra associated with sacral spina bifida occulta: a case report. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2013;56(3):126-129. doi: 10.14712/18059694.2014.21

41. Sharma A, Kumar A, Kapila A. Co-existence of spina bifida occulta and lumbosacral transitional vertebra in patients presenting with lower back pain. Reumatologia. 2022;60(1):70-75. doi: 10.5114/reum.2022.114171

42. Kundi M, Habib M, Babar S, et al. Transitional Vertebra and Spina Bifida Occulta Related with Chronic Low Back Pain in a Young Patient. Cureus. 2016;8(10):e837. doi: 10.7759/cureus.837

43. Illeez OG, Ulger FEB, Aktas I. The effect of transitional vertebrae and spina bifida occulta on disc herniation, disc degeneration, and end-plate changes in pediatric patients with low back pain. Acta Orthop Belg. 2022;88(2):275-283. doi: 10.52628/88.2.8528

44. Castellvi AE, Goldstein LA, Chan DP. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(5):493-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014

45. Gennari JM, Themar-Noel C, Panuel M, et al. Adolescent spinal pain: the pediatric orthopedist's point of view. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(6):247-250. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.06.012

46. Nardo L, Alizai H, Virayavanich W, et al. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: association with low back pain. Radiology. 2012;265(2):497-503. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12112747

47. Tang M, Yang XF, Yang SW, et al. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in a population-based study of 5860 individuals: prevalence and relationship to low back pain. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(9):1679-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.05.036

48. Kanematsu R, Hanakita J, Takahashi T, et al. Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by nearthrosis in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(9):2215-2221. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06460-1

49. Aamir S, Imtiaz H, Rehman Z, et al. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae In Patients Visiting Tertiary Care Hospital Of Khyber Pakhtukhwa: A Radiological Study. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020;32(2):234-237.

50. Luo R, Barsoum D, Ashraf H, et al. Prevalence of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae in Patients with Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement Requiring Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021;37(1):149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.08.034

51. Sivakumar V, Poonam C, Ethiraj D. et al. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra - Prevalence of Different Types in South Indian Population with Low Backache. JKIMSU. 2021;10(2):76-84.

52. Kappor K, Shukla A. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra: Prevalence and Association with Low Backache. Med Res Chronicles. 2022;9(1):38-44. doi: 10.26838/MEDRECH.2022.9.1.578

53. Daniel P, Joel JJ, Rana PK. Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae in Patients with Low Back Pain: Radiological Classification and Morphometric Analysis. J Anat Soc India. 2019;68:123-128. doi: 10.4103/JASI.JASI_61_19

54. Apaydin M, Uluc ME, Sezgin G. Lumbosacral transitional vertebra in the young men population with low back pain: anatomical considerations and degenerations (transitional vertebra types in the young men population with low back pain). Radiol Med. 2019;124(5):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s11547-018-0974-4

55. Vinha A, Bártolo J, Lemos C, et al. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: prevalence in a southern European population and its association with low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2022;31(12):3647-3653. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07415-4

56. Landauer F, Trieb K. Diagnostic Limitations and Aspects of the Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae (LSTV). Appl Sci. 2022;12(21):10830. doi: 10.3390/app122110830

57. Ahmadinejad N, Ghanaati H, Firouznia K. et al. Pathological Findings of Spinal MRI in Patients with Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra. Res J Biol Sci. 2009;4(2):166-170.

58. Haffer H, Becker L, Putzier M, et al. Changes of Fixed Anatomical Spinopelvic Parameter in Patients with Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: A Matched Pair Analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(1):59. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010059

59. Bhenderu LSS, Lyon KA, Richardson WT, et al. Treatment of unilateral L5-S1 locked facet in a pediatric patient. Surg Neurol Int. 2023;14:133. doi: 10.25259/SNI_234_2023

60. Tay M, Sian SCSH, Eow CZ, et al. Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar Spine Injection for Axial and Radicular Pain: A Single Institution Early Experience. Asian Spine J. 2021;15(2):216-223. doi: 10.31616/asj.2019.0399

61. Dhanjani S, Altaleb M, Margalit A, et al. Pediatric Back Pain Associated with Bertolotti Syndrome: A Report of 3 Cases with Varying Treatment Strategies. JBJS Case Connect. 2021;11(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.CC.21.00068

62. Sumarriva G, Cook B, Celestre P. Surgical Resection of Bertolotti Syndrome. Ochsner J. 2022;22(1):76-79. doi: 10.31486/toj.21.0012

63. Wu PH, Sebastian M, Kim HS, Heng GTY. How I do it? Uniportal full endoscopic pseudoarthrosis release of left L5/S1 Bertolotti's syndrome under intraoperative computer tomographic guidance in an ambulatory setting. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021;163(10):2789-2795. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04975-0

64. Mao G, Lubelski D, Zakaria HM, Theodore N. Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of the Bertolotti Syndrome-A Case Study: 2-Dimensional Operative Video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022;22(5):e222-e223. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000132

65. Ткаченко В.Д., Портнягин И.В., Горячева К.В. Эффективность и продолжительность действия радиочастотной денервации фасеточных суставов при боли в нижней части спины. Российский журнал боли. 2021;19(2):27-32. doi: 10.17116/pain20211902127

66. Belabbes S, Doumbeneny MJ, Chavihot C, Nguema BE. Bertolotti’s Syndrome: An Underdiagnosed Cause for Lower Back Pain in Young Adults. SAS J Med. 2022;8(4): 332-337. doi: 10.36347/sasjm.2022.v08i04.022

67. McGrath KA, Thompson NR, Fisher E, et al. Quality-of-life and postoperative satisfaction following pseudoarthrectomy in patients with Bertolotti syndrome. Spine J. 2022;22(8):1292-1300. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.010

68. Chang CJ, Chiu YP, Ji HR, et al. Surgical interventions for Bertolotti's syndrome: case report and review of unsatisfactory cases in the literature. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01498-y

69. Ju CI, Kim SW, Kim JG, et al. Decompressive L5 Transverse Processectomy for Bertolotti's Syndrome: A Preliminary Study. Pain Physician. 2017;20(6):E923-E932.

70. Babu H, Lagman C, Kim TT, et al. Intraoperative navigation-guided resection of anomalous transverse processes in patients with Bertolotti's syndrome. Surg Neurol Int. 2017;8:236. doi: 10.4103/sni.sni_173_17

71. Cuenca C, Bataille J, Ghouilem M, et al. Bertolotti's syndrome in children: From low-back pain to surgery. A case report. Neurochirurgie. 2019;65(6):421-424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.06.004

72. Louie CE, Hong J, Bauer DF. Surgical management of Bertolotti's syndrome in two adolescents and literature review. Surg Neurol Int. 2019;10:135. doi: 10.25259/SNI-305-2019

73. Mikula AL, Lakomkin N, Ransom RC, et al. Operative Treatment of Bertolotti Syndrome: Resection Versus Fusion. World Neurosurg. 2022;165:e311-e316. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.042

74. Gupta A, Badin D, Leland CR, et al. Updating the Evidence: Systematic Literature Review of Risk Factors and Strategies for Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Surgical Site Infection After Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 2023;43(8):e657-e668. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002464

75. Hanaoka S, Nakano Y, Nemoto M, et al. Automatic detection of vertebral number abnormalities in body CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12(5):719-732. doi: 10.1007/s11548-016-1516-y

76. Rojas CV, Olivares JI, Tutor PM, et al. Ontogeny of morphological variations in the vertebral column: Prevalence and bony variability in young Spanish children. Ann Anat. 2022;240:151888. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151888


Review

For citations:


Skryabin E.G., Krivtsov A.Yu., Kicherova O.A., Klokov I.N., Zotov P.B., Akselrov M.A. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae in children and adolescents (literature review, illustrated with clinical observations). Genij Ortopedii. 2024;30(2):282-291. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-2-282-291. EDN: ZXIXOK

Views: 743


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1028-4427 (Print)
ISSN 2542-131X (Online)