Preview

Genij Ortopedii

Advanced search

Long-term results and complication following Achilles tendon rupture repair

https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-1-28-37

EDN: MAWAKY

Abstract

Introduction Currently,there is no consensus regarding optimal treatment options of Achilles tendon rupture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long term results of Achilles tendon repair using different surgical techniques, assess complication rate and subjective satisfaction

Methods The study included patients treated for Achilles tendon rupture using minimally invasive and open surgical repair. Complications including re-rupture, infection, deep vein thrombosis and neuropraxia were identified. In order to evaluate the factors influencing the risk of postoperative complications, logistic regression analysis was performed. The Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) evaluated subjective outcomes.

Results 130 patients with Achilles tendon tear were enrolled (123 primary and 7 revision cases). In primary repairs percutaneous technique was used in 60 % of cases (74/123), mini open technique – in 16 % (19/123), and open technique – in 24 % (30/123). Re-rupture occurred in 2.4 % of patients treated with minimally invasive techniques. There were no repeated ruptures following open repairs. Predominant number of infections was registered after open repairs and made 10 %, while minimally invasive techniques had 3.2 % of infections. Logistic regression analyses showed that steroid injection, open repair, application of tapes and autografts increased the risk of infectious complications. There were no significant differences in ATRS and AOFAS scores between different primary Achilles tendon repair techniques (p > 0.05).

Discussion Results, obtained in the current study, are consistent with previously published data.

Conclusions Open Achilles tendon repair showed a higher rate of infections, and lower rate of re-ruptures. The anamnesis of steroid injection, open repair, application of tapes and autografts increases the risk of infectious complications.

About the Authors

N. E. Magnitskaya
Medswiss Medical center
Russian Federation

Nina E. Magnitskaya – Candidate of Medical Sciences, orthopedic traumatologist.

Moscow



A. N. Logvinov
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO)
Russian Federation

Alexey N. Logvinov – Candidate of Medical Sciences, orthopedic traumatologist.

Moscow



M. S. Ryazantsev
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO)
Russian Federation

Mikhail S. Ryazantsev – Candidate of Medical Sciences, traumatologist-orthopedist.

Moscow



P. S. Andreev
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Pavel S. Andreev – orthopedic traumatologist, graduate student.

Moscow



I. A. Vasilyev
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Ivan A. Vasiliev – orthopedic traumatologist, graduate student.

Moscow



D. A. Bessonov
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Bessonov – orthopedic traumatologist, graduate student.

Moscow



D. O. Ilyin
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Dmitry O. Ilyin – Doctor of Medical Sciences, orthopedist-traumatologist.

Moscow



A. V. Frolov
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Alexander V. Frolov – Candidate of Medical Sciences, orthopedic traumatologist, Associate Professor of the Department.

Moscow



A. V. Korolev
European Medical Center, European Clinic of Sports Traumatology and Orthopaedics (ECSTO); Patrice Lumumba Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Russian Federation

Andrey V. Korolev – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chief Physician, Professor of the Department.

Moscow



References

1. Raikin SM, Garras DN, Krapchev PV. Achilles tendon injuries in a United States population. Foot Ankle Int.2013;34(4):475-480. doi: 10.1177/1071100713477621

2. Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Rolf C, et al.Acute achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2419-2423. doi: 10.1177/0363546514540599

3. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury. 2008;39(12):1338-1344. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.021

4. Owens B, Mountcastle S, White D. Racial differences in tendon rupture incidence. Int J Sports Med. 2007;28(7):617-620. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-964837

5. Lemme NJ, Li NY, Kleiner JE, et al. Epidemiology and Video Analysis of Achilles Tendon Ruptures in the National Basketball Association. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(10):2360-2366. doi: 10.1177/0363546519858609

6. Gwynne-Jones DP, Sims M, Handcock D. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute Achilles tendon rupture with operative or nonoperative treatment using an identical functional bracing protocol. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(4):337-343. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0337

7. Houshian S, Tscherning T, Riegels-Nielsen P. The epidemiology of Achilles tendon rupture in a Danish county. Injury. 1998;29(9):651-654. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(98)00147-8

8. Leppilahti J, Puranen J, Orava S. Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67(3):277-279. doi: 10.3109/17453679608994688

9. Maffulli N, Waterston SW, Squair J, et al. Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland: a 15-year study. Clin J Sport Med. 1999;9(3):157-160. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199907000-00007

10. Ganestam A, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, Barfod KW. Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(12):3730-3737. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5

11. Vosseller JT, Ellis SJ, Levine DS, et al. Achilles tendon rupture in women. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(1):49-53. doi: 10.1177/1071100712460223

12. Malvankar S, Khan WS. Evolution of the Achilles tendon: The athlete's Achilles heel? Foot (Edinb). 2011;21(4):193-197. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2011.08.004

13. Zellers JA, Carmont MR, Grävare Silbernagel K. Return to play post-Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(21):1325-1332. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096106

14. Yang B, Liu Y, Kan S, et al. Outcomes and complications of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;40:178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.021

15. Trofa DP, Miller JC, Jang ES, et al. Professional Athletes' Return to Play and Performance After Operative Repair of an Achilles Tendon Rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(12):2864-2871. doi: 10.1177/0363546517713001

16. Carmont MR, Silbernagel KG, Mathy A, et al. Reliability of Achilles tendon resting angle and calf circumference measurement techniques. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(4):245-249. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.06.007

17. Campbell P, Lawton JO. Spontaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon: pathology and management. Br J Hosp Med. 1993;50(6):321-325.

18. Reinherz RP, Granoff SR, Westerfield M. Pathologic afflictions of the Achilles tendon. J Foot Surg. 1991;30(2):117-121.

19. Beavis RC, Rourke K, Court-Brown C. Avulsion fracture of the calcaneal tuberosity: a case report and literature review. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(8):863-866. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0000

20. Kannus P, Józsa L. Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon. A controlled study of 891 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(10):1507-1525. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199173100-00009

21. Möller A, Astron M, Westlin N. Increasing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67(5):479-481. doi: 10.3109/17453679608996672

22. Longo UG, Salvatore G, Risi Ambrogioni L, et al. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon surgery in Italy: a nationwide registry study, from 2001 through 2015. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):687. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03688-2

23. Plecko M, Passl R. Ruptures of the Achilles tendon: causes and treatment. J Finn Orthop Traumatol. 1991;14:201-204

24. Середа А. П. Хирургическое лечение разрывов ахиллова сухожилия: дис. … канд. мед наук. М.; 2015:324. Доступно по: https://www.dissercat.com/content/khirurgicheskoe-lechenie-razryvov-akhillova-sukhozhiliya. Ссылка активна на 29.08.2023.

25. Chan JJ, Chen KK, Sarker S, et al. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon injuries in collegiate level athletes in the United States. Int Orthop. 2020;44(3):585-594. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04471-2

26. Ефименко Н.А., Грицюк А.А., Середа А.П. Диагностика разрывов ахиллова сухожилия. Клиническая медицина. 2011;89(3):64-70.

27. Wu Y, Lin L, Li H, et al. Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Int J Surg. 2016;36(Pt A):305-311. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.014

28. Wilkins R, Bisson LJ. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(9):2154-2160. doi: 10.1177/0363546512453293

29. Maffulli G, Buono AD, Richards P, et al. Conservative, minimally invasive and open surgical repair for management of acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon: a clinical and functional retrospective study. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017;7(1):46-52. doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.046

30. Грицюк А.А., Середа А.П. Ахиллово сухожилие. М.: РАЕН; 2010:25-30.

31. McMahon SE, Smith TO,Hing CB.A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional to minimally invasive approaches for repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;17(4):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2010.11.001

32. Baumfeld D, Baumfeld T, Spiezia F, et al. Isokinetic functional outcomes of open versus percutaneous repair following Achilles tendon tears. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(4):503-506. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.03.003

33. Grassi A, Amendola A, Samuelsson K, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Repair for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Meta-Analysis Showing Reduced Complications, with Similar Outcomes, After Minimally Invasive Surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(22):1969-1981. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01364

34. Gatz M, Driessen A, Eschweiler J, et al. Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(3):383-401. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03437-z

35. Seow D,Yasui Y,Calder JDF, et al.Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complication Rates With Best- and Worst-Case Analyses for Rerupture Rates. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(13):3728-3748. doi: 10.1177/0363546521998284

36. Fell D, Enocson A, Lapidus LJ. Surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a follow-up of 639 consecutive cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020;30(5):895-899. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02650-1

37. Ahmad J, Jones K, Raikin SM. Treatment of Chronic Achilles Tendon Ruptures With Large Defects. Foot Ankle Spec. 2016;9(5):400-408. doi: 10.1177/1938640016640895

38. Caolo KC, Eble SK, Rider C, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Complications With Open vs Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon Repair. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021;6(4):24730114211060063. doi: 10.1177/24730114211060063

39. Aibinder WR, Patel A, Arnouk J, et al. The rate of sural nerve violation using the Achillon device: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(6):870-875. doi: 10.1177/1071100712473097


Review

For citations:


Magnitskaya N.E., Logvinov A.N., Ryazantsev M.S., Andreev P.S., Vasilyev I.A., Bessonov D.A., Ilyin D.O., Frolov A.V., Korolev A.V. Long-term results and complication following Achilles tendon rupture repair. Genij Ortopedii. 2024;30(1):28-37. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-1-28-37. EDN: MAWAKY

Views: 527


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1028-4427 (Print)
ISSN 2542-131X (Online)