Comparative efficacy of surgical methods in the treatment of foot drop associated with isolated peroneal nerve neuropathy
https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2026-32-2-162-171
Abstract
Introduction Footdrop secondary to isolated peroneal nerve neuropathy is associated with limited mobility affecting the quality of life. Objective data on comparative efficacy of surgical techniques are needed for long-term muscle denervation with nerve interventions being ineffective.
The objective was to determine the optimal surgical strategy for restoring dorsiflexion of the foot in case of isolated injury to the peroneal nerve through comparative analysis of the results of tenodesis of the extensor digitorum longus and posterior tibial muscle trasfer.
Material and methods Outcomes of 84 patients with isolated peroneal nerve neuropathy confirmed by electroneuromyography and lasting more than 12 months were prospectively analyzed. The first group included 42 patients treated with tenodesis of the extensor digitorum longus tendon to the anterior border of the tibia using a modified Lambrinudi technique. The second group consisted of 42 patients who underwent transfer of the posterior tibial muscle through the interosseous membrane with fixation to the lateral cuneiform bone using the Bridle technique. Functional assessment was produced using the AOFAS score, measuring dorsiflexion amplitude with goniometry, ankle dorsiflexor strength with dynamometer and stabilometric analysis of gait parameters at checkpoints of three, six, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Statistical processing was performed using parametric and nonparametric criteria at a significance level of < 0.05.
Results Between-the-group comparison revealed a statistically significant advantage of the muscle transfer evaluated with AOFAS (p = 0.003) and range of motion measurements (p = 0.001). Dynamometry showed dorsiflexion strength restored to 62.4 % of the contralateral limb in the first group and to 78.9 % in the second group (p < 0.001). Stabilometric analysis recorded a reduction in the center-of-pressure total trajectory length by 34.8 % with tenodesis and by 51.6 % with muscle transposition relative to preoperative values. The complication rate was 14.3% after tenodesis and 9.5 % after transfer (p = 0.386).
Discussion The superiority of the posterior tibial transfer can be explained by active muscle traction, as opposed to passive stabilization with tenodesis, which ensures a more physiological restoration of motor function. The strength and stabilometric parameters restored correlates with international data on the high effectiveness of active muscle transpositions during long-term denervation. Comprehensive postoperative rehabilitation using modern biofeedback technologies helps optimize the functional results of both techniques.
Conclusion Tibialis posterior muscle transfer demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant advantage over tenodesis of the extensor digitorum longus in restoration of the dorsiflexion function in patients with isolated peroneal nerve neuropathy lasting more than 12 months. The need to integrate personalized rehabilitation programs into the surgical treatment was supported by differences in the recovered ankle function and biomechanical gait parameters.
About the Authors
A. A. GrigoryanRussian Federation
Artsrun A. Grigoryan — post-graduate student
Moscow
W. M. Abu Zaalan
Russian Federation
Wessam Mussa Abu Zaalan — post-graduate student, orthopaedic surgeon
Moscow
L. G. Makinyan
Russian Federation
Levon G. Makinyan — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department, Head of Department
Moscow
A. M. Mannanov
Russian Federation
Albert M. Mannanov — Candidate of Medical Sciences, orthopaedic surgeon
Moscow
Ch. Moldamyrzayev
Russian Federation
Chyngis Moldamyrzayev — post-graduate student
Moscow
M. A. Imankulov
Russian Federation
Mikhail A. Imankulov — post-graduate student
Moscow
References
1. Febriana A, Subawa IW, Aryana IGNW, Sanjaya E. Revolutionizing Recovery: Tendon Transfer (Bridle Procedure) for Foot Drop in Traumatic Peroneal Nerve Injuries - A Case Series. IJRR. 2025;12(5):62-68. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20250508.
2. Eisenstein N, Fischer B, Nayagam S. Tibialis Posterior Tendon Transfer for the Management of Foot Drop. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2023;18(1):56-62. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1583.
3. Matsakyan AM, Shirmazanyan AG, Gorochvodatsky AV. Operations on the tendon of the posterior tibial muscle in the treatment of a static flat-valgus deformation. Vestnik of the Smolensk State Medical Academy. 2017;16(4):168177. (In Russ.)
4. Medina A. Modified bridle tendon transfer procedure following a complete musculature loss of the anterior leg compartment: Case report and literature review. Trauma Case Rep. 2019;24:100262. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100262.
5. Wareham LK, Liddelow SA, Temple S, et al. Solving neurodegeneration: common mechanisms and strategies for new treatments. Mol Neurodegener. 2022;17(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13024-022-00524-0.
6. Grigoryan AA, Makinyan LG, Mannanov AM, et al. Effectiveness of Bridle procedure for correction of foot drop syndrome due to peroneal nerve neuropathy. Genij Ortopedii. 2025;31(6): 737-743. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-6-737-743.
7. McCormick KL, Patel D, Chien BY, et al. Surgical Management of Foot Drop. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2024;16:120047. doi: 10.52965/001c.120047.
8. Golubeva YuB, Andrievskaya AO, Gorelova IK, et al. Orthopedic services as a tool of medical rehabilitation of patients with foot drop syndrome. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2020;120(10):91-99. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17116/jnevro202012010191.
9. Chen G, Ma L, Song R, et al. Speed-adaptive control of functional electrical stimulation for dropfoot correction. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0448-x.
10. Wiszomirska I, Błażkiewicz M, Kaczmarczyk K, et al. Effect of Drop Foot on Spatiotemporal, Kinematic, and Kinetic Parameters during Gait. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017;2017:3595461. doi: 10.1155/2017/3595461.
11. Aksenova EI, Gorbatov SYu, Maklakova YuA. Expert review: Rehabilitation technology industry in Russia and the world. Moscow: GBU «NIIOZMM DZM»; 2020:64. (In Russ.
12. Bashlachev MG. Clinic, diagnosis and surgical treatment of compression neuropathy of the common peroneal nerve at the level of the fibular head. Kand. Dis. Moscow; 2022:126. Available from: https://www.dissercat.com/content/klinika-diagnostika-i-khirurgicheskoe-lechenie-kompressionnoi-nevropatii-malobertsovogo-nerv. Accessed Nov 19, 2025. (In Russ.)
13. Somova M.M., Domanskiy V.L. Technology of intraoperative neuromonitoring by the method of polyprogram electric stimulation at reconstructive neuroplasty operations. Journal of Clinical Practice. 2019;10(4):46-52. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/clinpract18812.
14. Novikov AV, Antonova VA. Neuropathy of the peroneal nerve as a complication after total knee arthroplasty: characteristics of rehabilitation. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2020;27(4):41-45. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/vto57137.
15. Leclère FM, Badur N, Mathys L, Vögelin E. Neurotized lateral gastrocnemius muscle transfer for persistent traumatic peroneal nerve palsy: Surgical technique. Neurochirurgie. 2015;61(4):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.08.001.
16. Pang Z, Zhu S, Shen YD, et al. Functional outcomes of different surgical treatments for common peroneal nerve injuries: a retrospective comparative study. BMC Surg. 2024;24(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02354-x.
17. Bao B, Wei H, Zhu H, Zheng X. Transfer of Soleus Muscular Branch of Tibial Nerve to Deep Fibular Nerve to Repair Foot Drop After Common Peroneal Nerve Injury: A Retrospective Study. Front Neurol. 2022;13:745746. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.745746.
18. Nikitin SS, Murtazina AF, Druzhinin DS. Conduction block of excitation along the peripheral nerve as an electrophysiological phenomenon: a review of the literatur. Neuromuscular Disease. 2019;9(1):12-23. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17650/22228721-2019-9-1-12-23.
19. Fominykh AA, Kotov NB, Bessarabova AO, et al. Entarpment neuropathy of the peroneal nerve in the peroneal tunnel. Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2022;25(4):44-52. doi: 10.52581/1814-1471/83/05.
20. Vlasov AP, Lazarev MP, Kisel' DA, et al. Our experience with tendon-muscle transpositions in the treatment of chronic peroneal nerve injuries. Innovations in Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Rehabilitation: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Chita: Editorial and Publishing Center of the Chita State Medical Academy; 2024:31-33. (In Russ.)
21. Liu Z, Yushan M, Liu Y, Yusufu A. Prognostic factors in patients who underwent surgery for common peroneal nerve injury: a nest case-control study. BMC Surg. 2021;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-01033-x.
22. Lezak B, Massel DH, Varacallo MA. Peroneal Nerve Injury. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549859/.
23. Bojovic M, Dimitrijevic S, Olory BCR, et al. Overview of nerve entrapment syndromes in the foot and ankle. Int Orthop. 2025;49(4):853-862. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06469-5.
24. Fakih M, Alhojailan K, Volesky M. Knee intra-articular loose body causing a compression common peroneal nerve neuropathy with foot drop. BMJ Case Rep. 2025;18(1):e262880. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2024-262880.
25. Yadav U, Nemani M, Devgun A, et al. Iatrogenic Foot Drop After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft: Report of a Rare Case. Cureus. 2022;14(6):e26476. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26476.
26. Lale A, Kirkil C, Ozturk S, et al. The results of surgical decompression in the treatment of foot drop due to peroneal nerve entrapment after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(11):1684-1691. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.06.054.
27. Jiménez Siebert M, Kaiser N, Ziebarth K. Complete foot drop due to atypical peroneal ganglion in a 13 ½ year old boy. Neurochirurgie. 2025;71(1):101606. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2024.101606.
28. Peters BR, Pripotnev S, Chi D, Mackinnon SE. Complete Foot Drop With Normal Electrodiagnostic Studies: Sunderland "Zero" Ischemic Conduction Block of the Common Peroneal Nerve. Ann Plast Surg. 2022;88(4):425-428. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003053.
29. Carlson Strother C, Dittman LE, Spinner RJ, et al. Surgical management of peroneal nerve injuries. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023;165(9):2573-2580. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05727-y.
30. Oosterbos C, Rummens S, Bogaerts K, et al. Conservative versus surgical treatment of foot drop in peroneal nerve entrapment: rationale and design of a prospective, multi-centre, randomized parallel-group controlled trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):1065. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07009-x.
31. Miroshnikova PK, Lyundup AV, Batsalenko NP, et al. Perspective Nerve Conduits for Stimulation of Regeneration of Damaged Peripheral Nerves. Annals of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences. 2018;73(6):388-400. (In Russ.) doi: 10.15690/vramn1063.
32. Mens R, van Houten A, Brokelman RBG, Hoogeslag R. Iatrogenic common peroneal nerve injury during harvesting of semitendinosus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMJ Case Rep. 2021;14(4):e240736. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240736.
Review
For citations:
Grigoryan A.A., Abu Zaalan W.M., Makinyan L.G., Mannanov A.M., Moldamyrzayev Ch., Imankulov M.A. Comparative efficacy of surgical methods in the treatment of foot drop associated with isolated peroneal nerve neuropathy. Genij Ortopedii. 2026;32(2):162-171. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2026-32-2-162-171
JATS XML





























