An observational study on radiological and functional outcome of cross pinning versus parallel pinning in supracondylar humerus fracture
https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-6-720-728
Abstract
Introduction Supracondylar humerus fractures are the most common elbow fractures in children, often resulting from falls on an outstretched hand. The standard treatment for displaced fractures involves closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. However, the optimal pin configuration — cross-pinning (medial‑lateral) versus parallel pinning (lateral-lateral) — remains a topic of debate due to concerns regarding stability and risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury.
Aims This study aims to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of cross-pinning versus parallel inning in the management of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children.
Methods A prospective observational study was conducted over 18 months at Kalpana Chawla Govt. Medical College, Karnal, Haryana. A total of 54 children aged 3–12 years with Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical technique: cross-pinning (n = 27) and parallel pinning (n = 27). Both groups were comparable in terms of demographics, mechanism of injury, and pre-operative neurovascular status. Functional and radiographic outcomes were evaluated using Flynn’s criteria, Baumann’s angle, carrying angle, and range of motion at follow-up intervals (3, 6, 10, 14, and 24 weeks).
Results Mean Baumann’s angle, Carrying angle and range of motion showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups. At the final follow-up, 92.6 % of patients in the parallel pinning group had excellent outcomes per Flynn’s criteria, compared to 51.9 % in the cross-pinning group (p < 0.01). One patient in the cross-pinning group developed ulnar nerve neuropraxia, whereas no cases of nerve injury were reported in the parallel pinning group.
Conclusion Parallel pinning demonstrated superior radiological and functional outcomes, with a lower risk of ulnar nerve injury compared to cross pinning. These findings suggest that parallel pinning should be the preferred method for stabilizing displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children.
About the Authors
K. KumarIndia
Kuljit Kumar — MBBS, MS, Professor
Karnal, Haryan
J. Khan
India
Javed Khan — MBBS, Junior Resident
Karnal, Haryan
M. Jindal
India
Mohit Jindal — MBBS, MS, Associate Professor
Karnal, Haryan
References
1. Shenoy PM, Islam A, Puri R. Current Management of Paediatric Supracondylar Fractures of the Humerus. Cureus. 2020;12(5):e8137. doi: 10.7759/cureus.8137.
2. Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;109(2):145-154.
3. Mostafa E, Imonugo O, Varacallo MA. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Humerus. 2023 Aug 7. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.
4. Landin LA, Danielsson LG. Elbow fractures in children. An epidemiological analysis of 589 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57(4):309-312. doi: 10.3109/17453678608994398.
5. Ersan O, Gonen E, İlhan RD, et al. Comparison of anterior and lateral approaches in the treatment of extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012;21(2):121-126. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32834dd1b2.
6. Rupesh RK, Mahendhira JV, Gopinath G. A comparative study of functional outcome of criss-cross pinning Vs parallel pinning for Gartland type III supracondylar humeral fractures in children in tertiary care centre. Int J Orthop Sci. 2023;5(1):170-174. doi: 10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i1c.3292.
7. Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years' experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(2):263-272.
8. Afaque SF, Singh A, Maharjan R, et al. Comparison of clinic-radiological outcome of cross pinning versus lateral pinning for displaced supracondylar fracture of humerus in children: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(2):259-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2019.01.013.
9. Mandal J, Sarkar P, Singh A, et al. Study of clinical and radiological outcomes in paediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated with 3 lateral pins versus crossed pins. Int J Orthop Sci. 2018;4(2):745-749. doi: 10.22271/ortho.2018.v4.i2k.108.
10. Singh SK, Singh P, Gill SP, et al. A comparative study of cross pinning versus lateral pinning technique in the management of completely displaced type-III supra condylar humerus fracture in the rural India children: A prospective study. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil. 2021;13:122-128. doi: 10.4103/jotr.jotr_13_21,
11. Khan AA, Younas MO, Mehmood AS, Laraib BI. Compare the functional outcomes of closed reduction and percutaneous cross pinning versus lateral pinning in supracondylar fracture of humerus in children. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2021;15(8):2154-2156. doi: 10.53350/pjmhs211582154.
12. Eguia F, Gottlich C, Lobaton G, et al. Mid-term Patient-reported Outcomes After Lateral Versus Crossed Pinning of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020;40(7):323-328. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001558.
13. Younus S, Peracha A, Shah SK, et al. Percutaneous Pinning for Displaced Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Pediatric Age Group: Comparison between Lateral Pinning Versus Crossed Pinning Techniques. OROAJ. 2018;11(3): 555817. doi: 10.19080/OROAJ.2018.11.555817.
14. Sapkota K, Wahegaonkar K, Ranjeet N, et al. Comparison of cross pinning versus lateral three pins in type three supracondylar fracture of distal humerus in children. Asian J Me Sci. 2019;10(2):58-61. doi: 10.3126/ajms.v10i2.22034.
15. Brauer CA, Lee BM, Bae DS, et al. A systematic review of medial and lateral entry pinning versus lateral entry pinning for supracondylar fractures of the humerus. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(2):181-186. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e3180316cf1.
16. Shim JS, Lee YS. Treatment of completely displaced supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children by cross-fixation with three Kirschner wires. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22(1):12-16.
17. Green DW, Widmann RF, Frank JS, Gardner MJ. Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini-open technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(3):158-163. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200503000-00002.
18. Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Sixteen years' experience with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(2):263-272.
Review
For citations:
Kumar K., Khan J., Jindal M. An observational study on radiological and functional outcome of cross pinning versus parallel pinning in supracondylar humerus fracture. Genij Ortopedii. 2025;31(6):720-728. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-6-720-728
JATS XML





























