Antibacterial action of lysozyme against osteomyelitis agents: S. aureus and S. epidermidis
https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-3-334-340
Abstract
Introduction The use of lysozyme as a bactericidal agent against the leading pathogens of chronic osteomyelitis can become an alternative or supplement to existing antibacterial drugs.
Purpose To study the antibacterial effect of lysozyme against clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis
Materials and methods Control strains of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 14990) and clinical strains (n = 48), including MRSA (n = 6) and MRSE (n = 6), isolated from wounds and fistulas of patients with chronic osteomyelitis were used as test cultures. The antibacterial effect of lysozyme was assessed using the disk diffusion method.
Results Lysozyme exhibited bactericidal activity against control strains of S. aureus and S. epidermidis, the growth inhibition zone of bacteria was 11–12 mm. Among clinical strains of S. aureus, 87.5 % were sensitive to lysozyme, the growth inhibition zone diameter was 9–13 mm. No bactericidal effect was observed against three strains of S. aureus, including two MRSAs, and continuous bacterial growth was observed around the disk. Among strains of S. epidermidis, the antibacterial activity of lysozyme was observed against 79.2 % of isolates, the growth inhibition diameter was 8–11 mm. Resistance of three MRSE strains to lysozyme was noted. Lysozyme enhanced the effect of vancomycin and cefoxitin against methicillin-sensitive staphylococci and norfloxacin and vancomycin against methicillin-resistant staphylococci.
Discussion Despite the inhibitory effect found, the use of lysozyme alone may be limited due to its possible degradation by proteases, as well as some immunogenicity. There are studies on the synergism of the combined action of lysozyme with various antibiotics on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The data obtained in our experiment showed an increased antibacterial effect by the combined action of antibiotics and lysozyme against the leading causative agents of osteomyelitis.
Conclusion It has been established that lysozyme has an antibacterial effect against clinical strains of S. aureus, S. epidermidis, including MRSA and MRSE, isolated from wounds of patients with chronic osteomyelitis. An increased antibacterial effect is observed by a combined action of lysozyme with cefotaxime, norfloxacin and vancomycin.
About the Authors
I. V. ShipitsynaRussian Federation
Irina V. Shipitsyna — Candidate of Biological Sciences, Leading Researcher
Kurgan
E. V. Osipova
Russian Federation
Elena V. Osipova — Candidate of Biological Sciences, Senior Researcher
Kurgan
References
1. Nasser A, Azimi T, Ostadmohammadi S, Ostadmohammadi S. A comprehensive review of bacterial osteomyelitis with emphasis on Staphylococcus aureus. Microb Pathog. 2020;148:104431. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104431.
2. Shipitsyna IV, Osipova EV. Monitoring of the leading gram-positive microflora and its antibiotic sensitivity in individuals with chronic osteomyelitis over a three-year period. Genij ortopedii. 2022;28(2):189-193. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427- 2022-28-2-189-193.
3. Mironov SP, Tsiskarashvili AV, Gorbatyuk DS. Chronic post-traumatic osteomyelitis as a problem of modern traumatology and orthopedics (literature review). Genij ortopedii. 2019;25(4):610-621. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-4-610-621.
4. Besal R, Adamič P, Beović B, Papst L. Systemic Antimicrobial Treatment of Chronic Osteomyelitis in Adults: A Narrative Review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(6):944. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12060944.
5. Ovsyannikov VG, Toropkina YuE, Kraskevich VV, et al. Lysozyme — the boundaries of the possible. Modern problems of science and education. 2020;(3). (In Russ.) doi: 10.17513/spno.29903.
6. Potapov MI. Functions, properties and uses of lysozyme. Trends in the development of science and education. 2022;(84):120-124. (In Russ.) doi: 10.18411/trnio-04-2022-80.
7. Kalyuzhin OV. Antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and immunomodulatory effects of lysozyme: from mechanisms to pharmacological use. Effective pharmacotherapy. 2018;(14):6-12. (In Russ.) Available at: https://umedp.ru/upload/iblock/645/Lizobakt.pdf. Accessed Mar 13, 2025.
8. Ferraboschi P, Ciceri S, Grisenti P. Applications of Lysozyme, an Innate Immune Defense Factor, as an Alternative Antibiotic. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(12):1534. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121534.
9. Zharkova MS, Orlov DS, Golubeva OY, et al. Application of antimicrobial peptides of the innate immune system in combination with conventional antibiotics-a novel way to combat antibiotic resistance? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:128. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00128.
10. Wang X, Zhang M, Zhu T, et al. Flourishing antibacterial strategies for osteomyelitis therapy. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023;10(11):e2206154. doi: 10.1002/advs.202206154.
11. Shipitsyna IV, Osipova EV. Antibiotic resistance of S. epidermidis isolated from wounds of patients with purulent infection of bones and joints. Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology. 2023;86(9):43-48. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30906/0869-2092-2023-86-9-43-4814.
12. Shamova OV, Zharkova MS, Chernov AN, et al. Antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity as prototypes of new agents to fight antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Russian Journal for Personalized Medicine. 2021;1(1):146-172. (In Russ.)
13. Carrillo W, Lucio A, Gaibor J, et al. Isolation of Antibacterial Hydrolysates from Hen Egg White Lysozyme and Identification of Antibacterial Peptides. J Med Food. 2018;21(8):808-818. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2017.0134.
14. Wu T, Jiang Q, Wu D, et al. What is new in lysozyme research and its application in food industry? A review. Food Chem. 2019;274:698-709. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.017.
15. Primo ED, Otero LH, Ruiz F, et al. The disruptive effect of lysozyme on the bacterial cell wall explored by an in-silico structural outlook. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2018;46(1):83-90. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21092.
16. Grishin AV, Karyagina AS, Vasina DV, et al. Resistance to peptidoglycan-degrading enzymes. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2020;46(6):703-726. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1825333.
17. Chen LL, Shi WP, Zhang TD, et al. Antibacterial activity of lysozyme-loaded cream against MRSA and promotion of scalded wound healing. Int J Pharm. 2022;627:122200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122200.
18. Zou L, Xiong X, Liu H, et al. Effects of dietary lysozyme levels on growth performance, intestinal morphology, immunity response and microbiota community of growing pigs. J Sci Food Agric. 2019;99(4):1643-1650. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9348.
19. Ragland SA, Criss AK. From bacterial killing to immune modulation: Recent insights into the functions of lysozyme. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(9):e1006512. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006512.
20. Taylor TM, Johnson EA, Larson AE. Lysozyme. In: Davidson PM, Taylor TM, David JRD. (eds.). Antimicrobials in Food. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2020:445-474. doi: 10.1201/9780429058196.
21. Brasca M, Morandi S, Silvetti T, et al. Different analytical approaches in assessing antibacterial activity and the purity of commercial lysozyme preparations for dairy application. Molecules. 2013;18(5):6008-6020. doi: 10.3390/molecules18056008.
22. Silvetti T, Morandi S, Hintersteiner M, Brasca M. Use of hen egg white lysozyme in the food industry. In: Hester PY. (ed.). Egg Innovations and Strategies for Improvements. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2017:233-242. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800879-9.00022-6.
23. Wu T, Huang J, Jiang Y, et al. Formation of hydrogels based on chitosan/alginate for the delivery of lysozyme and their antibacterial activity. Food Chem. 2018;240:361-369. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.052.
24. Gong W, Huang HB, Wang XC, et al. Construction of a sustained-release hydrogel using gallic acid and lysozyme with antimicrobial properties for wound treatment. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(23):6836-6849. doi: 10.1039/d2bm00658h.
25. Zhao M, Huang M, Li Z. Exploring the therapeutic potential of recombinant human lysozyme: a review on wound management system with antibacterial. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1292149. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1292149.
26. Wu CL, Peng KL, Yip BS, et al. Boosting Synergistic Effects of Short Antimicrobial Peptides With Conventional Antibiotics Against Resistant Bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:747760. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.747760.
27. Moravej H, Moravej Z, Yazdanparast M, et al. Antimicrobial Peptides: Features, Action, and Their Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(6):747-767. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0392.
28. Thellin O, Zorzi W, Zorzi D, et al. Lysozyme as a cotreatment during antibiotics use against vaginal infections: An in vitro study on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilm models. Int Microbiol. 2016;19(2):101-107. doi: 10.2436/20.1501.01.268.
29. Assoni L, Milani B, Carvalho MR, et al. Resistance Mechanisms to Antimicrobial Peptides in Gram-Positive Bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:593215. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.593215.
30. Gordinа EM, Horowitz ES, Lemkinа LM, Pospelovа SV. The study of the stability of lysozyme to the bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus. Diary of Kazan Medical School. 2018;(1):12-14. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Shipitsyna I.V., Osipova E.V. Antibacterial action of lysozyme against osteomyelitis agents: S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Genij Ortopedii. 2025;31(3):334-340. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-3-334-340