Preview

Genij Ortopedii

Advanced search

Lateral cortical notching for impaired healing of extra-articular proximal femur fractures (case report)

https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-5-687-693

EDN: SCMEOL

Abstract

Introduction Dynamization of the nail can be used to improve osteoreparation during intramedullary interlocking nailing (IIN). The procedure can be difficult to perform in some sub- and intertrochanteric femoral fractures due to anatomical and functional features.

The objective was to demonstrate a case of successful use of an original version of the lateral cortical notching (LCN) technique for dynamization of an intramedullary proximal nail in a patient with a nonunited subtrochanteric fracture.

Material and methods The treatment was performed for a 66-year-old patient with a non-united intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur complicated by the breakage of an intramedullary nail. The LCN technique was successfully used to dynamize the IM nail.

Results Radiological healing of the fracture and functional recovery of the patient were observed at a two-month follow-up. The absence of interfragmental compression in IIN could be caused by blocking of the sliding screw by the lateral cortical bone of the peripheral femur fragment. The complication could be prevented with LCN during primary osteosynthesis of the above fractures.

Discussion Based on scientific publications and our clinical experience, we assumed that LCN can be indicated for  failed healing of intertrochanteric AO/OTA 31A3.1–3 fractures, type 3 Boyd and Griffin trochanteric fractures and all types of subtrochanteric fractures as graded by Seinsheimer with a vector of interfragmental compression to be created along the femur axis during cephalomedullary osteosynthesis. The case report showed the mechanism of impaired consolidation in some intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Conclusion The case report demonstrateed the successful use of the original version of the lateral cortical notching (LCN) technique for dynamization of an intramedullary proximal nail.

About the Authors

R. A. Shafigulin
Republican Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Rashid A. Shafigulin — Candidate of Medical Sciences, orthopaedic surgeon

Kazan



I. F. Akhtyamov
Kazan State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ildar F. Akhtyamov — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Kazan



I. A. Aglyamov
Republican Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Ilnar A. Aglyamov — orthopaedic surgeon

Kazan



A. A. Gornaev
Republican Clinical Hospital
Russian Federation

Andrey A. Gornaev — orthopaedic surgeon

Kazan



References

1. Barbosa de Toledo Lourenço PR, Pires RE. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: update. Rev Bras Ortop. 2016;51(3):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2016.03.001

2. Joglekar SB, Lindvall EM, Martirosian A. Contemporary management of subtrochanteric fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015;46(1):21-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2014.09.001

3. Bekos A, Sioutis S, Kostroglou A et al. The history of intramedullary nailing. Int Orthop. 2021;45(5):1355-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-04973-y

4. Pan LH, Wang JP, Liao Y. Delayed dynamization for non-union of femoral shaft fractures after static interlocking nailing. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014;28:419-422

5. Vaughn J, Gotha H, Cohen E, et al. Nail Dynamization for Delayed Union and Nonunion in Femur and Tibia Fractures. Orthopedics. 2016;39(6):e1117-e1123. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160819-01

6. Stolberg-Stolberg J, Fuchs T, Lodde MF, et al. Addition of shock wave therapy to nail dynamization increases the chance of long-bone non-union healing. J Orthop Traumatol. 2022;23(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00620-9

7. Wu CC, Chen WJ. Healing of 56 segmental femoral shaft fractures after locked nailing. Poor results of dynamization. Acta Orthop Scand. 1997;68(6):537-540. doi: 10.3109/17453679708999022

8. Litrenta J, Tornetta P 3rd, Vallier H et al. Dynamizations and exchanges: success rates and indications. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(12):569-573. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000311

9. Pihlajamäki HK, Salminen ST, Böstman OM. The treatment of nonunions following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16(6):394-402. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200207000-00005

10. Zheng TL, Li Y, Liu SK, et al. Proper dynamization of interlocking intramedullary nail for non-infectious delayed union of femoral shaft fractures. Orthop J China. 2018;26:2017–2021.

11. Khabibyanov RYa, Shafigulin RA, Galeev IG, Nikitin MA. Method of removing the broken distal end of the femoral cannulated intramedullary nail. Patent RF, no. 2682128, 2019. Available at: https://searchplatform.rospatent.gov.ru/media/National/RU/C1/2019/03/14/0002682128//document.pdf. Accessed Jun 26, 2024. (In Russ.)

12. Hu M, Zeng W, Zhang J, et al. Fixators dynamization for delayed union and non-union of femur and tibial fractures: a review of techniques, timing and influence factors. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04054-3

13. Kempf I, Grosse A, Beck G. Closed locked intramedullary nailing. Its application to comminuted fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(5):709-20. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198567050-00005

14. Eveleigh RJ. A review of biomechanical studies of intramedullary nails. Med Eng Phys. 1995;17(5):323-331. doi: 10.1016/1350-4533(95)97311-c

15. Iwakura T, Niikura T, Lee SY, et al. Breakage of a third generation gamma nail: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Orthop. 2013;2013:172352. doi: 10.1155/2013/172352

16. Rollo G, Rinonapoli G, Pichierri P, et al. Breakage in two points of a short and undersized "Affixus" cephalomedullary nail in a very active elderly female: a case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Orthop. 2018;2018:9580190. doi: 10.1155/2018/9580190

17. Eberle S, Bauer C, Gerber C, et al. The stability of a hip fracture determines the fatigue of an intramedullary nail. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(4):577-584. doi: 10.1243/09544119JEIM664

18. Andrzejowski P, Giannoudis PV. The 'diamond concept' for long bone non-union management. J Orthop Traumatol. 2019;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0528-0

19. Biber R, Bail HJ, Stedtfeld HW. Lateral cortical notching in specific cases of delayed unions or nonunions after intertrochanteric and reversed fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(4):495-501. doi: 10.1007/s00402-013-1683-z

20. Tinner C, Beckmann NA, Bastian JD. Lateral cortical notching in revision of a subtrochanteric fracture non-union with breakage of a cephalomedullary nail. J Orthop Case Rep. 2020;10(6):5-8. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2020.v10.i06.1852

21. Hinz N, Stacenko K, Lutz C et al. Lateral cortical notching facilitates dynamization of proximal femoral nailing - A finite element analysis. Injury. 2023;54(11):111009. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111009


Review

For citations:


Shafigulin R.A., Akhtyamov I.F., Aglyamov I.A., Gornaev A.A. Lateral cortical notching for impaired healing of extra-articular proximal femur fractures (case report). Genij Ortopedii. 2024;30(5):687-693. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-5-687-693. EDN: SCMEOL

Views: 260


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1028-4427 (Print)
ISSN 2542-131X (Online)