Limb lengthening and deformity correction in patients with severe fibular hemimelia: experience of the children's university hospital in Belgrade

Background Fibular hemimelia (FH) is a congenital disease manifested by valgus deformity and instability of the knee joint, shortening and deformity of the tibia, hypoplasia and deformities of the foot and ankle.

The aim of this paper was to determine the efficacy of the strategy of separate reconstruction of the foot along with correction of tibia deformity, and then tibial lengthening in patients with FH of types 3 and 4 according to Paley.

Methods This retrospective study is based on an analysis of the treatment of 12 children with severe FH. The patients, aged no older than 24 months, were treated for foot reconstruction along with correction of tibial deformity followed by a separate stage of tibial lengthening. Tibial lengthening was performed in the age 4.6 ± 1.2 years. The long-term result of treatment was evaluated at least 1 year after the end of tibial lengthening. Evaluation criteria after tibia lengthening were external osteosynthesis index, amount of lengthening, assessment of outcomes according to Lascombes. Walking ability was assessed using Gillette questionnaire.

Results The approach we used gave excellent and good results in 83 % of cases after the first reconstructive stage. Complications and recurrences of deformities encountered during the first stage were eliminated during subsequent planned limb lengthening. The average magnitude of lengthening was 6.4 ± 2.4 cm (37.2 ± 12.4 % of the initial segment length). The index of external osteosynthesis was 22.9 ± 12.2 days/cm. Monofocal distraction osteosynthesis was used in 9 cases and bifocal osteosynthesis in three cases. The results of lengthening were classified by Lascombes as IA in 7 cases, IB in four cases, 2B in one case.

Discussion In severe FH, the question of reconstruction or early amputation remains open. There are two opinions on the staging of reconstructive orthopedic surgery and tibial lengthening in young children with severe FH.

Conclusion The strategy of reconstruction of the foot and ankle joint at an early age (16-24 months) in children with severe FH followed by lengthening of the lower leg (at the age of 4-6 years) proved to be effective and can be used when it is chosen by the patient's parents. In 3C type cases, the use of external fixation to correct the deformity and simultaneously lengthen the tibia at the first stage is an alternative reasonable strategy option.

1. Froster UG, Baird PA. Congenital defects of lower limbs and associated malformations: a population based study. Am J Med Genet. 1993;45(1):60-64. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320450116

2. Rogala EJ, Wynne-Davies R, Littlejohn A, Gormley J. Congenital limb anomalies: frequency and aetiological factors. Data from the Edinburgh Register of the Newborn (1964-68). J Med Genet. 1974;11(3):221-233. doi: 10.1136/jmg.11.3.221

3. Georgescu T, Ionescu O, Toader OD, Bacalbasa N, Pop LG. Fibular hemimelia. J Med Life. 2022;15(4):587-588. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0397

4. Fordham LA, Applegate KE, Wilkes DC, Chung CJ. Fibular Hemimelia: More thanjust anabsent bone.Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 1999;3(3):227-238. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080068

5. Popkov A, Aranovich A, Popkov D. Prevention of recurrence of tibia and ankle deformities after bone lengthening in children with type II fibular hemimelia. Int Orthop. 2015;39(7):1365-1370. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2752-4

6. Fuller CB, Shannon CE, Paley D. Lengthening Reconstruction Surgery for Fibular Hemimelia: A Review. Children (Basel). 2021;8(6):467. doi: 10.3390/children8060467

7. Birch JG, Paley D, Herzenberg JE, et al. Amputation Versus Staged Reconstruction for Severe Fibular Hemimelia: Assessment of Psychosocial and Quality-of-Life Status and Physical Functioning in Childhood. JB JS Open Access. 2019;4(2):e0053. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.18.00053

8. Elmherig A, Ahmed AF, Hegazy A, et al. Amputation Versus Limb Reconstruction for Fibula Hemimelia: A Meta-analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020;40(8):425-430. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001510

9. Nossov SB, Hollin IL, Phillips J, Franklin CC. Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency/Congenital Femoral Deficiency: Evaluation and Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022;30(13):e899-e910. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01186

10. Morris EJ, Tofts L, Patterson M, et al. Physical performance of children with longitudinal fibular deficiency (fibular hemimelia). Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2763-2773. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1849420

11. Patel M, Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Limb-lengthening versus amputation for fibular hemimelia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(2):317-319. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200202000-00021

12. Kulkarni RM, Arora N, Saxena S, et al. Use of Paley Classification and SUPERankle Procedure in the Management of Fibular Hemimelia. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019;39(9):e708-e717. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001012

13. Herzenberg JE, Shabtai L, Standard SC. Fibular hemimelia: principles and techniques of management. In: Sabharwal, S. (eds) Pediatric lower limb deformities. Springer, Cham. 2016:427-454. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17097-8_23

14. Попков А.В., Аранович А.М., Попков Д.А. Особенности оперативного лечения детей с врожденной гемимелией малоберцовой кости. Гений ортопедии. 2013;(1):55-60.

15. Paley D. Surgical reconstruction for fibular hemimelia. J Child Orthop. 2016;10(6):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0790-0

16. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Tetsworth K, et al. Deformity planning for frontal and sagittal plane corrective osteotomies. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):425-465.

17. Popkov D, Lascombes P, Berte N, et al. The normal radiological anteroposterior alignment of the lower limb in children. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44(2):197-206. doi: 10.1007/s00256-014-1953-z

18. Novacheck TF, Stout JL, Tervo R. Reliability and validity of the Gillette Functional Assessment Questionnaire as an outcome measure in children with walking disabilities. J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;20(1):75-81.

19. Lascombes P, Popkov D, Huber H, et al. Classification of complications after progressive long bone lengthening: proposal for a new classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012;98(6):629-637. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.010

20. Леончук С.С., Неретин А.С., Мурадисинов С.О. и др. Рентгенологические особенности стопы у пациентов с врожденной гемимелией малоберцовой кости. REJR. 2021;11(2):219-226. doi: 10.21569/2222-7415-2021-11-2-219-226

21. Hefti F. Malformations of the lower extremities. Orthopade. 2008;37(4):381-402. (In German) doi: 10.1007/s00132-008-1250-4

22. Tonbul M, Adas M, Keris I. Combined fibular and tarsal agenesis in a case of lower extremity hemimelia. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2007;46(4):278-82. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2007.03.005

23. Osebold WR, Lester EL, Christenson DM. Problems with excessive residual lower leg length in pediatric amputees. Iowa Orthop J. 2001;21:58-67.

24. Calder P, Shaw S, Roberts A, et al. A comparison of functional outcome between amputation and extension prosthesis in the treatment of congenital absence of the fibula with severe limb deformity. J Child Orthop. 2017;11(4):318-325. doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.160264

25. Johnson CE, Haideri NF. Comparison of functional outcome in fibular deficiency treated by limb salvage versus Syme’s amputation. In: Herring JA, Birch JG (eds) The child with a limb deficiency. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Publ.; 1998:173-177.

26. Cheng JC, Cheung KW, Ng BK. Severe progressive deformities after limb lengthening in type-II fibular hemimelia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(5):772-776. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.80b5.8475

27. Naudie D, Hamdy RC, Fassier F, et al. Management of fibular hemimelia: amputation or limb lengthening. J Bon Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(1):58-65. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.79b1.6602

28. Mingazov E, Gvozdev N, Popkov A, et al. Preliminary Results of Bone Lengthening over Telescopic Titanium Intramedullary Rod. Case Rep Orthop. 2023;2023:4796006. doi: 10.1155/2023/4796006