Application of the technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint
https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2021-27-2-220-226
Abstract
Introduction. To date, there is no unified approach to the choice of tactics in surgical treatment of osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (OA of the first MTP joint). On the other hand, it is known that the technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis has been successfully used for osteochondral defects in the hip, knee and ankle joints. Therefore, we have proposed to use this technique in the treatment of patients with OA of the first MTP joint.
Purpose. To study the possibility of surgical treatment of patients with OA of the first MTP joint with the use of chondroplasty utilizing the technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis, to demonstrate the immediate and mid-term results of such operations.
Materials and methods. Chondroplasty was performed in 15 patients (16 feet) with OA of the first MTP joint. The examination determined the range of motion in of the first MTP joint; the condition was assessed according to such scales as VAS for pain, AOFAS, FFI. Chondroplasty in of the first MTP joint was performed with the technique of induced chondrogenesis using a collagen matrix. The results of the operations were evaluated after 3, 6 and 12 months.
Results. As early as 3 months after the operation, there was a marked significant increase in the range of motion and a decrease in pain of the first MTP joint. Moderate positive dynamics were observed after 6 and 12 months.
Conclusion. The results of the operations showed that chondroplasty of the first MTP joint is an effective method of surgical treatment that provides pain relief and significantly improves the quality of life of patients with OA of the first MTP joint. However, it is necessary to study long-term results.
About the Authors
M. R. NurmukhametovRussian Federation
Maxim R. Nurmukhametov, M.D.,
Moscow
M. A. Makarov
Russian Federation
Maxim A. Makarov, M.D., Ph.D.,
Moscow
E. I. Byalik
Russian Federation
Evgeny I. Byalik, M.D., Ph.D., Professor,
Moscow
Ya. B. Khrennikov
Russian Federation
Yaroslav B. Khrennikov, M.D., Ph.D.,
Moscow
V. E. Byalik
Russian Federation
Valery E. Byalik, M.D.,
Moscow
V. A. Nesterenko
Russian Federation
Vadim A. Nesterenko, M.D.,
Moscow
References
1. Berezhnoi S.Iu. Artroz pervogo pliusnefalangovogo sustava: chreskozhnoe operativnoe lechenie, vybor khirurgicheskoi metodiki, kliniko-rentgenologicheskaia klassifikatsiia [Arthrosis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint: percutaneous surgical treatment, choice of surgical technique, clinical and roentgenological classification]. Travmatologiia i Ortopediia Rossii, 2017, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 8-22. (in Russian) DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2017-23-1-8-22
2. McNeil D.S., Baumhauer J.F., Glazebrook M.A. Evidence-based analysis of the efficacy for operative treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int., 2013, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 15-32. DOI: 10.1177/1071100712460220
3. Sorbie C., Saunders G.A. Hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int., 2008, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 273-281. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2008.0273
4. Mackey R.B., Thomson A.B., Kwon O., Mueller M.J., Johnson J.E. The modified oblique Keller capsular interpositional arthroplasty for hallux rigidus. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2010, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 1938-1946. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00412.
5. Erdil M., Elmadag N.M., Polat G., Tunçer N., Bilsel K., Uçan V., Erkoçak O.F., Sen C. Comparison of Arthrodesis, Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty, and Total Joint Replacement in the Treatment of Advanced Hallux Rigidus. J. Foot Ankle Surg., 2013, vol. 52, pp. 588-593. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2013.03.014
6. Calvo A., Viladot R., Giné J., Alvarez F. The importance of the length of the first metatarsal and the proximal phalanx of hallux in the etiopathogeny of the hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Surg., 2009, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 69-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2008.08.001.
7. Keiserman L., Sammarco J., Sammarco G.J. Surgical treatment of the hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Clin. N. Am., 2005, vol. 10, pp. 75-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2004.09.005
8. Waizy H., Czardybon M.A., Stukenborg-Colsman C., Wingenfeld C., Wellmann M., Windhagen H., Frank D. Mid- and long-term results of the joint preserving therapy of hallux rigidus. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 2010, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 165-170. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0857-1
9. Canseco K., Long J., Marks R., Khazzam M.S., Harris G. Quantitative motion analysis in patients with hallux rigidus before and after cheilectomy. J. Orthop. Res., 2009, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 128-134. DOI: 10.1002/jor.20711
10. Seibert N.R., Kadakia A.R. Surgical management of hallux rigidus: cheilectomy and osteotomy (phalanx and metatarsal). Foot Ankle Clin., 2009, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 9-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2008.11.002
11. Harrison T., Fawzy E., Dinah F., Palmer S.H. Prospective Assessment of Dorsal Cheilectomy for Hallux Rigidus Using a Patient-reported Outcome Score. J. Foot Ankle Surg., 2010, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 232-237. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.02.004
12. Coughlin M.J., Shurnas P.S. Hallux rigidus. Grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., 2003, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 2072-2088. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200311000-00003
13. Peace R.A., Hamilton G.A. End-Stage Hallux Rigidus. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg., 2012, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 341-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2012.04.002
14. Perler A.D., Nwosu V., Christie D., Higgins K. End-stage osteoarthritis of the great toe/hallux rigidus: a review of the alternatives to arthrodesis: implant versus osteotomies and arthroplasty techniques. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg., 2013, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 351-395, DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2013.04.011
15. Benthien J.P., Behrens P. Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC): combining microfracturing and a collagen I/III matrix for articular cartilage resurfacing. Cartilage, 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65-68. DOI: 10.1177/1947603509360044
16. Gille J., Behrens P., Volpi P., De Girolamo L., Reiss E., Zoch W., Anders S. Outcome of Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) in cartilage knee surgery: data of the AMIC Registry. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 2013, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 87-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-012-1621-5
17. Jannelli E., Fontana A. Arthroscopic treatment of chondral defects in the hip: AMIC, MACI, microfragmented adipose tissue transplantation (MATT) and other options. SICOT J., 2017, vol. 3, pp. 43. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2017029
18. Usuelli F.G., D’Ambrosi R., Maccario C., Boga M., De Girolamo L. All-arthroscopic AMIC® (AT-AMIC®) technique with autologous bone graft for talar osteochondral defects: clinical and radiological results. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc., 2018, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 875-881. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4318-4
19. Fontana A., De Girolamo L. Sustained five-year benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for femoral acetabular impingement-induced chondral lesions compared with microfracture treatment. Bone Joint J., 2015, vol. 97-B, no. 5, pp. 628-635. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B5.35076
20. Nurmukhametov M.R., Makarov M.A., Bialik E.I., Bialik V.E., Nesterenko V.A. Ispolzovanie khondroplastiki i pliusnefalangovogo sustava po tekhnike autologichnogo indutsirovannogo matritsei khondrogeneza dlia lecheniia patsientov s hallux rigidus: blizhaishie rezultaty [The use of chondroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint according to the technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for the treatment of patients with hallux rigidus: short-term results]. Nauchno-Prakticheskaia Revmatologiia, 2020, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 97-101. (in Russian) DOI: 10.14412/1995-4484-2020-97-101
21. Nurmukhametov M.R., Makarov M.A., Makarov S.A., Bialik E.I., Khrennikov Ia.B., Bialik V.E., Nesterenko V.A. Khondroplastika po tekhnike autologichnogo indutsirovannogo matritsei khondrogeneza (AMIC) kak novyi metod khirurgicheskogo lecheniia patsientov s hallux rigidus. Blizhaishie i srednesrochnye rezultaty [Chondroplasty according to the technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) as a new method of surgical treatment of patients with hallux rigidus. Short-term and med-term results]. III Mezhdunarodnyi Kongress Assotsiatsii Revmoortopedov: tez. dokl. [Proceedings of the III International Congress of the Association of Rheumoorthopedists]. Voronezh, Nauchnaia Kniga, 2019, pp. 85-87. (in Russian)
22. Kitaoka H.B., Alexander I.J., Adelaar R.S., Nunley J.A., Myerson M.S., Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int., 1994, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 349-353. DOI: 10.1177/107110079401500701
23. Budiman-Mak E., Conrad K.J., Roach K.E. The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J. Clin. Epidemiol., 1991, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 561-570. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90220-4
24. Pratt J. Remarks on Zeros and Ties in the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Procedures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1959, vol. 54, no. 287, pp. 655-667. DOI: 10.2307/2282543
25. Sidorenko E.V. Metody matematicheskoi obrabotki v psikhologii [Methods of mathematical processing in psychology]. SPb., Rech, 2000, 350 p. (in Russian)
26. Derner R., Goss K., Postowski H.N., Parsley N. A plantar-flexor-shortening osteotomy for hallux rigidus: a retrospective analysis. J. Foot Ankle Surg., 2005, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 377-389. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2005.07.010
27. Freeman B.L., Hardy M.A. Multiplanar phalangeal and metatarsal osteotomies for hallux rigidus. Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg., 2011, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 329-344. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2011.03.002
28. Goucher N.R., Coughlin M.J. Hallux metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using dome-shaped reamers and dorsal plate fixation: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int., 2006, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 869-876. DOI: 10.1177/107110070602701101
29. Bennett G.L., Sabetta J. First metatarsal phalangeal joint arthrodesis: evaluation of plate and screw fixation. Foot Ankle Int., 2009, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 752-757. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2009.0752
30. Ellington J.K., Jones C.P., Cohen B.E., Davis W.H., Nickisch F., Anderson R.B. Review of 107 hallux MTP joint arthrodesis using dome-shaped reamers and a stainless-steel dorsal plate. Foot Ankle Int., 2010, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 385-390. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0385
31. Bobrov D.S., Sliniakov L.Iu., Sukhareva A.G., Kholodaev M.Iu., Iakimov L.A. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie peregruzochnoi metatarzalgii [Surgical treatment of overload metatarsalgia]. Moskovskii Khirurgicheskii Zhurnal, 2014, no. 3 (37), pp. 25-27. (in Russian)
32. Van Doeselaar D.J., Heesterbeek P.J., Louwerens J.W., Swierstra B.A. Foot function after fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Foot Ankle Int., 2010, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 670-675. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2010.0670
33. DeFrino P.F., Brodsky J.W., Pollo F.E., Crenshaw S.J., Beischer A.D. First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a clinical, pedobarographic and gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int., 2002, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 496-502. DOI: 10.1177/107110070202300605.
34. Polzer H., Polzer S., Brumann M., Mutschler W., Regauer M. Hallux rigidus: joint preserving alternatives to arthrodesis – a review of the literature. World J. Orthop., 2014, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6-13. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i1.6
35. Richter M., Zech S., Andreas Meissner S. Matrix-associated stem cell transplantation (MAST) in chondral defects of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint is safe and effective – 2-year-follow-up in 20 patients. Foot Ankle Surg., 2017, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 195-200. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.05.318
Review
For citations:
Nurmukhametov M.R., Makarov M.A., Byalik E.I., Khrennikov Ya.B., Byalik V.E., Nesterenko V.A. Application of the technique of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Genij Ortopedii. 2021;27(2):220-226. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2021-27-2-220-226