Preview

Genij Ortopedii

Advanced search

The role of culture-negative infection among infectious complications after total knee arthroplasty

https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-4-402-409

EDN: LUEAAK

Abstract

Introduction Diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is difficult with the clinical signs of periprosthetic inflammation showing no growth of microorganism in the biomaterial. The frequency of culture-negative infection can reach 42.1 %. The objective of the study was to analyze outcomes of two-stage treatment of chronic PJI of the knee joint depending on the etiology of the infectious process.

Material and methods A retrospective analysis of outcomes was produced for 103 patients: group I (n=30) showing no growth of microorganisms and group II (n = 73) demonstrating positive growth of pathogens. Knee PJI was diagnosed according to the 2018 ICM criteria. A favorable outcome suggested absence of recurrence for at least two years after reimplantation of endoprosthesis, arthrodesis, “life with a spacer” without signs of infection.

Results Culture-negative infection was detected in 29.1 % (n = 30). Patients in the group were 1.5 times more likely to receive antibiotic therapy prior to admission and had average levels of CRP, ESR and articular leukocyte count being 1.5-2 times less than those in group II. Staphylococci (69.8 %) including MRSE (75 %) was the leading pathogen in group II. Recurrence of infection was 3.4 % in group I and 16.9 % in group II (p = 0.0928), the two-stage treatment was successful in 96.7 % and 74 %, respectively (p = 0.0064).

Discussion Causes for the lack of growth of microorganisms in biological materials included previous antibiotic therapy, wound drainage, violations of the rules for sampling of biological material, absence of media for the growth of atypical microorganisms and the ability of microorganisms to form biofilms on implant surfaces. An emergency histological examination of the affected tissues was practical during surgery in doubtful situations for adequate surgical approach. The results of a meta-analysis (2023) showed that the replacement of an infected endoprosthesis was more effective for the treatment of a culture-negative infection compared to debridement and preservation of implant.

Conclusion The culture-negative infection group in our series showed better success rate of a two-stage treatment of PJI using implant replacement and broad-spectrum empiric antibiotic therapy at a two-year follow-up period. The negative microbiological result in the group could be caused by antibacterial drugs administered prior to diagnosis of PJI.

About the Authors

L. V. Lyubimova
Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
Russian Federation

Lyudmila V. Lyubimova – Clinical Pharmacologist

Cheboksary



S. A. Bozhkova
Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics
Russian Federation

Svetlana A. Bozhkova – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Saint-Petersburg



N. N. Pchelova
Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
Russian Federation

Nadezhda N. Pchelova – Doctor of Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics

Cheboksary



E. V. Preobrazhenskaya
Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
Russian Federation

Elena V. Preobrazhenskaya – Head of Department

Cheboksary



E. A. Lyubimov
Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
Russian Federation

Evgeniy A. Lyubimov – Anesthesiologist-resuscitator

Cheboksary



References

1. Reisener M, Perka C. Do Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections Have a Worse Outcome Than Culture-Positive Periprosthetic Joint Infections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6278012. doi: 10.1155/2018/6278012

2. Yoon HK, Cho SH, Lee DY, et al. A Review of the Literature on Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29(3):155-164. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.034

3. Kalbian I, Park JW, Goswami K, et al. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection: prevalence, aetiology, evaluation, recommendations, and treatment. Int Orthop. 2020;44(7):1255-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04627-5

4. Bozhkova SA, Kasimova AR, Tikhilov RM, et al. Adverse trends in the etiology of orthopedic Infection: results of 6-year monitoring of the structure and resistance of leading pathogens s. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2018;24(4):20-31. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-4-20-31

5. Mortazavi SM, Vegari D, Ho A, Zmistowski B, Parvizi J. Two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty: predictors of failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(11):3049-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2030-8

6. Choi HR, Kwon YM, Freiberg AA, Nelson SB, Malchau H. Periprosthetic joint infection with negative culture results: clinical characteristics and treatment outcome. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6):899-903. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.022

7. Huang R, Hu CC, Adeli B, Mortazavi J, Parvizi J. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection does not preclude infection control. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2717-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2434-0

8. Goh GS, Parvizi J. Diagnosis and Treatment of Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37(8):1488- 1493. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.061

9. Nikolaev NS, Pchelova NN, Preobrazhenskaya EV, Nazarova VV, Dobrovol’skaya N.Yu. “Unexpected” Infections in Revision Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2021;27(3):56- 70. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-3-56-70

10. Trampuz A, Renz N. Pocket Guide to Diagnosis Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI). PRO-IMPLANT foundation; 2017.

11. Berbari EF, Marculescu C, Sia I, et al. Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45(9):1113-9. doi: 10.1086/522184

12. Kim YH, Kulkarni SS, Park JW, Kim JS, Oh HK, Rastogi D. Comparison of infection control rates and clinical outcomes in culturepositive and culture-negative infected total-knee arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2015;12(Suppl 1):S37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2015.01.020

13. Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Kim DJ. The outcome of infected total knee arthroplasty: culture-positive versus culture-negative. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015;135(10):1459-67. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2286-7

14. Tan TL, Kheir MM, Shohat N, Tan DD, Kheir M, Chen C, Parvizi J. Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: An Update on What to Expect. JB JS Open Access. 2018;3(3):e0060. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00060

15. Malekzadeh D, Osmon DR, Lahr BD, Hanssen AD, Berbari EF. Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culturenegative prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(8):2039-45. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1338-0

16. Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1869-75. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01255

17. Nikolaev NS, Borisova LV, Didichenko SN, et al. Optimal methods for treating infectious complications in endoprosthesis replacement of large joints in modern conditions. Ural'skii meditsinskii zhurnal. [Ural Medical Journal]. 2015;(10):51-56] (In Russ.)

18. Yoon HK, Cho SH, Lee DY, Kang BH, Lee SH, Moon DG, Kim DH, Nam DC, Hwang SC. A Review of the Literature on CultureNegative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017;29(3):155-164. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.034

19. Goh GS, Parvizi J. Think Twice before Prescribing Antibiotics for That Swollen Knee: The Influence of Antibiotics on the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(2):114. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10020114

20. Parvizi J, Erkocak OF, Della Valle CJ. Culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(5):430-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01793

21. Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(7):654-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061588

22. Peterson BW, He Y, Ren Y, et al. Viscoelasticity of biofilms and their recalcitrance to mechanical and chemical challenges. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39(2):234-45. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuu008

23. Oliver JD. Recent findings on the viable but nonculturable state in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010;34(4):415-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00200.x

24. Lleò MM, Benedetti D, Tafi MC, Signoretto C, Canepari P. Inhibition of the resuscitation from the viable but non-culturable state in Enterococcus faecalis. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9(9):2313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01345.x

25. Tarabichi M, Shohat N, Goswami K, Alvand A, Silibovsky R, Belden K, Parvizi J. Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Potential of Next-Generation Sequencing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(2):147-154. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00434

26. Kurtz SM, Lau EC, Son MS, et al. Are We Winning or Losing the Battle With Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Trends in Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Mortality Risk for the Medicare Population. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(10):3238-3245. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.042

27. Morawietz L, Tiddens O, Mueller M, et al. Twenty-three neutrophil granulocytes in 10 high-power fields is the best histopathological threshold to differentiate between aseptic and septic endoprosthesis loosening. Histopathology. 2009;54(7):847- 53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03313.x

28. Krenn V, Kölbel B, Wienert S et al. A new algorithm for histopathological diagnosis of periprosthetic infection using CD15 focus score and computer program CD15 QuantiFier. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2015;(3):76-85. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2015-0-3-76-85

29. Silantieva TA, Ermakov AM, Tryapichnikov AS. Histological evaluation of periprosthetic infection using HOES and CD15 expression analysis in hip revision arthroplasty. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2021;27(2):84-98. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2021-27-2-84-98

30. Li F, Qiao Y, Zhang H, Cao G, Zhou S. Comparable clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03692-x

31. Bejon P, Berendt A, Atkins BL, et al. Two-stage revision for prosthetic joint infection: predictors of outcome and the role of reimplantation microbiology. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65(3):569-75. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp469

32. Bozhkova SA, Bogdanova TYa, Krasnova MV, et al. Experimental and clinical study of phenotypic features of S. Epidermidis strains and their role in theemergenceand development of implant-associated infection after orthopaedic surgery. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2014;(2):68-77. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2014-0-2-68-77

33. Botelho AMN, Nunes ZDG, Asensi MD, et al. Characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from hospital indoor air and a comparative analysis between airborne and inpatient isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61(Pt 8):1136-1145. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.035931-0

34. Nikolaev NS, Lyubimova LV, Pchelova NN, et al. Treatment of periprosthetic Infection with silver-doped implants based on two-dimensional ordered linear chain carbon. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii [Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia]. 2019;25(4):98-108. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-98-108


Review

For citations:


Lyubimova L.V., Bozhkova S.A., Pchelova N.N., Preobrazhenskaya E.V., Lyubimov E.A. The role of culture-negative infection among infectious complications after total knee arthroplasty. Genij Ortopedii. 2023;29(4):402-409. https://doi.org/10.18019/1028-4427-2023-29-4-402-409. EDN: LUEAAK

Views: 371


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1028-4427 (Print)
ISSN 2542-131X (Online)