Arthrodesis with the Ilizarov ring ffxator for severe ankle arthritis

Introduction End-stage ankle arthritis is a very painful and disabling pathology, associated with deformity. Infection, poor skin condition, chronic smoking, Charcot arthropathy may not only affect selection of treatment method but also union, leading to unfortunate amputation. Ankle arthrodesis is indicated in advanced ankle arthritis. A variety of fixation methods are available for arthrodesis ranging from internal to external fixation. The Ilizarov ring fixator is a dynamic versatile fixation method. It is a biomechanically stable and minimally invasive method which promotes bone union and has advantage of initiating early weight-bearing and simultaneous deformity correction. We describe our experience in Ilizarov ring fixator application for ankle arthrodesis in 5 patients with severe ankle arthritis and their functional outcome.

Materials and Methods This retrospective study was conducted in 5 ankle arthrodesis cases using the Ilizarov ring fixator application from July 2021 to October 2022 in the department of orthopaedics, Jaipur national university, India. Average age of patient was 52 years (range, 40-65). Among included patients one patient had chronic osteomyelitis of the distal tibia and severe arthrosis of the ankle joint with a non-healing ulcer, two patients had post-traumatic arthrosis following talus and distal tibia plafond fracture, Charcot ankle arthropathy and tuberculosis of the ankle joint was detected in two patients respectively. Postoperative pain relief, deformity correction and radiological union at the fusion site were defined as success.

Results Fusion was achieved in all patients (100%). Early post-operative ambulation and full weight-bearing was initiated in every case. Pin-tract infection was the commonest complication. Shortening due to arthrodesis was less than 2.5 cm so limb lengthening was not done. Frame removal time was 12 to 14 weeks (average time, 13 weeks). Visual analogue scale was used in all cases. It was in the range of 2 to 3 points preoperatively and 7 to 9 post-operatively after arthrodesis. Average follow-up period was 6 months and it is still underway. AOFAS score was used for functional assessment.

Conclusion Ilizarov ring fixator application can be considered as versatile, biomechanically stable, minimally invasive method for ankle arthrodesis in severe ankle arthritis associated with poor soft tissue condition, post- traumatic arthritis, infection, deformity, bone loss, Charcot arthropathy.

1. Zarutsky E, Rush SM, Schuberth JM. The use of circular wire external fixation in the treatment of salvage ankle arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2005;44(1):22-31. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2004

2. Eylon S, Porat S, Bor N, Leibner ED. Outcome of Ilizarov ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(8):873-9. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0873

3. Cierny G 3rd, Cook WG, Mader JT. Ankle arthrodesis in the presence of ongoing sepsis. Indications, methods, and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 1989;20(4):709-21.

4. Morasiewicz P, Dejnek M, Orzechowski W, et al. Clinical evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation and internal fixation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2524-1

5. Hasan O, Fahad S, Sattar S, et al. Ankle Arthrodesis using Ilizarov Ring Fixator: A Primary or Salvage Procedure? An Analysis of Twenty Cases. Malays Orthop J. 2018;12(3):24-30. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1811.006

6. Fabrin J, Larsen K, Holstein PE. Arthrodesis with external fixation in the unstable or misaligned Charcot ankle in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2007;6(2):102-7. doi: 10.1177/1534734607302379

7. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(238):249-81.

8. Fragomen AT, Borst E, Schachter L, et al. Complex ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method yields high rate of fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(10):2864-73. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2470-9

9. Kollig E, Esenwein SA, Muhr G, Kutscha-Lissberg F. Fusion of the septic ankle: experience with 15 cases using hybrid external fixation. J Trauma. 2003;55(4):685-91. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000051933.83342.E4

10. Haskell A, Pfeiff C, Mann R. Subtalar joint arthrodesis using a single lag screw. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25(11):774-7. doi: 10.1177/107110070402501103

11. Grivas TB, Magnissalis EA. The use of twin-ring Ilizarov external fixator constructs: application and biomechanical proof-of principle with possible clinical indications. J Orthop Surg Res. 2011;6:41. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-41

12. Leite AM, Menezes HM, Aquino IEC, et al. Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis using an Ilizarov fixator. Rev Bras Ortop. 2013;48(1):57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2013.04.005

13. Tellisi N, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov S, Rozbruch SR. Limb salvage reconstruction of the ankle with fusion and simultaneous tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov/Taylor spatial frame. HSS J. 2008;4(1):32-42. doi: 10.1007/s11420-007-9073-0

14. Hawkins BJ, Langerman RJ, Anger DM, Calhoun JH. The Ilizarov technique in ankle fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(303):217-25.

15. Kovoor CC, Padmanabhan V, Bhaskar D, et al. Ankle fusion for bone loss around the ankle joint using the Ilizarov technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(3):361-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.20935. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(8):1120.

16. Morasiewicz P, Dejnek M, Urbański W, et al. Radiological evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation compared to internal fixation. Injury. 2017;48(7):1678-1683. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.013

17. Charnley J. Compression arthrodesis of the ankle and shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1951;33B(2):180-91.

18. Zwipp H, Rammelt S, Endres T, Heineck J. High union rates and function scores at midterm followup with ankle arthrodesis using a four screw technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):958-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-1074-5

19. Honnenahalli Chandrappa M, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Ankle arthrodesis-Open versus arthroscopic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(Suppl 2):S71-S77. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.03.010

20. Katsenis D, Bhave A, Paley D, Herzenberg JE. Treatment of malunion and nonunion at the site of an ankle fusion with the Ilizarov apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(2):302-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01421

21. Manke E, Yeo Eng Meng N, Rammelt S. Ankle Arthrodesis - a Review of Current Techniques and Results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(4):225-236.

22. Khanfour AA. Versatility of Ilizarov technique in difficult cases of ankle arthrodesis and review of literature. Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;19(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2012.10.001

23. Goldberg AJ, Zaidi R, Thomson C, et al. Total ankle replacement versus arthrodesis (TARVA): protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9):e012716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012716

24. Salem KH, Kinzl L, Schmelz A. Ankle arthrodesis using Ilizarov ring fixators: a review of 22 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):764-70. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701002

25. Houdek MT, Wilke BK, Ryssman DB, Turner NS. Radiographic and functional outcomes following bilateral ankle fusions. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(12):1250-4. doi: 10.1177/1071100714551947

26. Illgner U, Budny T, Frohne I, et al. Clinical benefit and improvement of activity level after reconstruction surgery of Charcot feet using external fixation: 24-months results of 292 feet. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:392. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-392

27. Sakurakichi K, Tsuchiya H, Uehara K, et al. Ankle arthrodesis combined with tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov apparatus. J Orthop Sci. 2003;8(1):20-5. doi: 10.1007/s007760300003

28. Anazor F, Sibanda V, Abubakar A, Dhinsa BS. Computed Tomography Scan Architectural Measurements in Adult Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Narrative Review for Orthopaedic Trainees. Cureus. 2022;14(11):e32039. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32039

29. Matsubara H, Watanabe K, Takata M, et al. A New Classification for Ankle Arthrodesis When Using an External Fixator. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2019;14(3):148-154. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1436