<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">genort</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Гений ортопедии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Genij Ortopedii</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1028-4427</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2542-131X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ЦЕНТР ИЛИЗАРОВА</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">genort-1774</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Лечение закрытых переломов ключицы различными вариантами остеосинтеза</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Treatment of closed clavicular fractures using various osteosynthesis variants</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Мартель</surname><given-names>И. И.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple"></email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Дарвин</surname><given-names>Е. О.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple"></email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2011</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title>№ 4 (2011)</issue-title><elocation-id>1774</elocation-id><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Мартель И., Дарвин Е., 2011</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Мартель И., Дарвин Е.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Мартель И., Дарвин Е.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ilizarov-journal.com/jour/article/view/1774">https://www.ilizarov-journal.com/jour/article/view/1774</self-uri><abstract><p>Изучены истории болезни 124 больных с переломами ключицы, пролеченных различными вариантами чрескостного остеосинтеза. Описаны основные варианты остеосинтеза ключицы при ее диафизарных переломах. Прослежены результаты оперативного лечения переломов ключицы в сроки до одного года после снятия аппарата. Проанализированы ошибки и осложнения при примененных вариантах оперативного лечения ключицы. Даны сравнительные оценки каждому примененному варианту остеосинтеза ключицы. Выявлено, что открытая репозиция отломков с фиксацией интрамедуллярной спицей дает наибольшее количество осложнений. Альтернативой ей должен служить вариант закрытого чрескостного остеосинтеза ключицы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Medical reports of 124 patients with clavicular fractures treated using various variants of transosseous osteosynthesis have been studied. The main osteosynthesis variants applied to the clavicle in case of its shaft fractures have been described. The results of surgical treatment of clavicular fractures in the periods up to one year after the device removal have been followed. The errors and complications for the used variants of clavicle surgical treatment have been analyzed. Comparative evaluations for each used variant of clavicle osteosynthesis have been demonstrated. The open reposition of fragments with intramedullary wire fixation has been revealed to cause the most number of complications. The variant of closed transosseous osteosynthesis of the clavicle should be an alternative to it.</p></trans-abstract></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
