<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">genort</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Гений ортопедии</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Genij Ortopedii</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1028-4427</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2542-131X</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ЦЕНТР ИЛИЗАРОВА</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">genort-1560</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Диафизарные переломы большеберцовой кости: блокированный или расширяющийся гвоздь?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Tibial shaft fractures: locked nail versus extending one</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Минасов</surname><given-names>Т. Б.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple"></email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ханин</surname><given-names>М. Ю.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple"></email></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Минасов</surname><given-names>И. Б.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple"></email></contrib></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2009</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>12</month><year>2009</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><issue-title>№ 4 (2009)</issue-title><elocation-id>1560</elocation-id><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Минасов Т., Ханин М., Минасов И., 2009</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2009</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Минасов Т., Ханин М., Минасов И.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Минасов Т., Ханин М., Минасов И.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ilizarov-journal.com/jour/article/view/1560">https://www.ilizarov-journal.com/jour/article/view/1560</self-uri><abstract><p>Изучены механические свойства системы кость-имплант в условиях различных вариантов остеосинтеза при диафизарных переломах большеберцовой кости. Было выявлено, что любой вид  стабильно-функционального остеосинтеза обеспечивает резистентность синтезированного сегмента к возрастающей осевой нагрузке большую, чем у интактного образца. Наибольшую устойчивость к осевому сжатию продемонстрировали системы интрамедуллярной фиксации, однако наиболее длительная сопротивляемость нагрузке была отмечена у систем внеочаговой фиксации. Наименее прочными из изученных были системы, фиксированные  LC-DCP пластинами, тем не менее их устойчивость была в среднем на 22 % больше, чем и нтактных образцов контрольной группы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The mechanical properties of bone-implant system under the conditions of osteosynthesis different variants for tibial shaft fractures have been studied. Any variant of stable-and-functional osteosynthesis has been revealed to provide the greater stability of synthesized segment to increasing axial load than that of intact sample. The systems of intramedullary fixation have demonstrated the greatest stability to axial compression, however, the systems of extrafocal fixation have shown the longest stabilty to loading. The systems, fixed with LC-DCP plates, were the least strong among those examined, nevertheless, their stability was 22% more on the average, than that of the intact samples of control group.</p></trans-abstract></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
